3Rivers Archery



The Trad Gang Digital Market













Contribute to Trad Gang and Access the Classifieds!

Become a Trad Gang Sponsor!

Traditional Archery for Bowhunters






LEFT HAND BOWS CLASSIFIEDS TRAD GANG CLASSIFIEDS ACCESS RIGHT HAND BOWS CLASSIFIEDS


Author Topic: Beman Vs Easton  (Read 326 times)

Offline amicus

  • Trad Bowhunter
  • **
  • Posts: 1034
Beman Vs Easton
« on: November 04, 2010, 02:23:00 PM »
The other day I walked into the local archery store and asked for a dozen beman ics hunters 340. The owner said that he did not have any at the moment but had some easton arrows. He said that the eastons were the exact same arrow. The only difference was the name. Arrow weight was the same but just wondering if anybody can verify this? Any info would be appreciated.

Gilbert
The blessing of the Lord, it maketh rich and He addeth no sorrow with it. Prov 10;22

A sinner saved by Grace.

Offline Crash

  • Contributing Member
  • Trad Bowhunter
  • ****
  • Posts: 578
Re: Beman Vs Easton
« Reply #1 on: November 04, 2010, 02:27:00 PM »
Easton owns Beman.
"Instinctive archery is all about possibilities.  Mechanist archery is all about alternatives. "  Dean Torges

Offline Ragnarok Forge

  • Trad Bowhunter
  • **
  • Posts: 3034
Re: Beman Vs Easton
« Reply #2 on: November 04, 2010, 02:47:00 PM »
I use easton shafts and they work great for me.  If they spine the same then they essentially are identical despite the name.  If Easton owns Beman then they shafts are probably made in the same plant.
Clay Walker
Skill is not born into anyone.  It is earned thru hard work and perseverance.

Offline chopx2

  • TGMM Member
  • Trad Bowhunter
  • ***
  • Posts: 953
Re: Beman Vs Easton
« Reply #3 on: November 04, 2010, 03:09:00 PM »
Some of their shafts are identical. There are only a handful of carbon shaft makers. many of the brands you know by other names were made for them by one the top 3 or 4 manufacturers. if the specs are identical then they are likely made in same plant and the only difference is labeling and sometimes price.
TGMM-Family of the Bow

The quest to improve is so focused on a few design aspects & compensating for hunter ineptness as to actually have reduced a bow & arrow’s effectiveness. Nothing better demonstrates this than mech. BHs & speed fixated designs

Offline JRY309

  • Trad Bowhunter
  • **
  • Posts: 4383
Re: Beman Vs Easton
« Reply #4 on: November 04, 2010, 03:56:00 PM »
Which Easton's were they,Easton makes quite a few different carbon arrows.They are both consistent in spine,but if they are different diameters it may affect your tune alittle.I think Easton/Beman makes excellent arrows.

Offline amicus

  • Trad Bowhunter
  • **
  • Posts: 1034
Re: Beman Vs Easton
« Reply #5 on: November 04, 2010, 04:58:00 PM »
Im not sure which easton's they are but supposed to be the same as beman ics hunters. I knew that easton was associated with beman but did not know the details. I just want to make sure they are the same. I really like my bemans and would hate to spend the cash on some eastons and than not be the same.
The blessing of the Lord, it maketh rich and He addeth no sorrow with it. Prov 10;22

A sinner saved by Grace.

Offline Bowwild

  • TG HALL OF FAME
  • Trad Bowhunter
  • *****
  • Posts: 5433
Re: Beman Vs Easton
« Reply #6 on: November 04, 2010, 06:25:00 PM »
Like others have written, Easton owns Beeman.  However, while arrows are similar not very many models would be the "same".  For example, there is no Easton brand that is the same as the Beman MFX Classic. Are there Easton shafts that fill the same bill (excep for appearance)? Yep.

More than a grain of salt is needed when you ask questions of some people in some archery shops. I very rarely ask the shop workers anything except 'do they have this or that'. If they don't have it I don't want to why I don't need it. For example, looking for some inserts for 1916 shafts several months ago I was told 'no one shoots aluminum anymore'.  I know the majority of folks shoot carbon (among all archers not just traditionalists) but there are still plenty of aluminum fans out there.

Offline Earl Jeff

  • Trad Bowhunter
  • **
  • Posts: 858
Re: Beman Vs Easton
« Reply #7 on: November 04, 2010, 06:31:00 PM »
I had to pull four pieces of a Beman shaft out of my hand when one exploded when I released it. It might have been my fault since I was stump shooting but I'm still scared to use them.   :(

Offline Bald Spot

  • Trad Bowhunter
  • **
  • Posts: 53
Re: Beman Vs Easton
« Reply #8 on: November 04, 2010, 09:29:00 PM »
I'd take a flying guess that the ICS is the same arrow as the Epic that I shoot sometimes.  Really good arrows but the 600's can be a little delicate.  As for the MFX, I believe they are an AXIS with the wood grain cover, hence the extra weight.  From all the carbons I've shot and destroyed my AXIS are in a whole nother league for tough...I mean hit a concrete wall head on with a 60lb Groves Spitfire and they bounce back about 8' and jump back on the nock for more.

Offline JRY309

  • Trad Bowhunter
  • **
  • Posts: 4383
Re: Beman Vs Easton
« Reply #9 on: November 05, 2010, 07:49:00 AM »
The Easton ST Epic's are a smaller diameter then ICS,ST Epic take their own nock and insert,they are 9/32".Axis/MFX use the same nocks and inserts.Easton Power Flight are the same diameter and use the same nocks & inserts as Beman ICS.

Offline beetlebailey1977

  • Trad Bowhunter
  • **
  • Posts: 576
Re: Beman Vs Easton
« Reply #10 on: November 05, 2010, 09:35:00 AM »
Yeah Easton owns Beman.  Get some MFX classics you will not regret them at all.
Bowhunters of South Carolina Executive Council Member.


James V. Bailey II

Offline B/W lvr

  • Trad Bowhunter
  • **
  • Posts: 144
Re: Beman Vs Easton
« Reply #11 on: November 05, 2010, 08:38:00 PM »
Beeman is owned by Easton but that doesn't mean the arrows are the same. I don't know if you can get any of the 2 to match with weight, spine or diameter. Just buy the ones you like and never believe ANYONE  in an archery store. They are there to sell their product not help you. Frank

Offline ishoot4thrills

  • Trad Bowhunter
  • **
  • Posts: 3445
Re: Beman Vs Easton
« Reply #12 on: November 05, 2010, 09:53:00 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by beetlebailey1977:
Yeah Easton owns Beman.  Get some MFX classics you will not regret them at all.
X2! The Beman MFX Classics are the best arrows I have ever shot. And I've shot several.
58" JK Traditions Kanati Longbow
Ten Strand D10 String
Kanati Bow Quiver
35/55 Gold Tip Pink Nugents @ 30"
3 X 5" Feathers
19.9% FOC
49# @ 26.75"
165 FPS @ 10.4 GPP (510 gr. hunting arrow)
171 FPS @ 9.7 GPP (475 gr. 3D arrow)
3 Fingers Under

Users currently browsing this topic:

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
 

Contact Us | Trad Gang.com © | User Agreement

Copyright 2003 thru 2024 ~ Trad Gang.com ©