3Rivers Archery



The Trad Gang Digital Market













Contribute to Trad Gang and Access the Classifieds!

Become a Trad Gang Sponsor!

Traditional Archery for Bowhunters






LEFT HAND BOWS CLASSIFIEDS TRAD GANG CLASSIFIEDS ACCESS RIGHT HAND BOWS CLASSIFIEDS


Author Topic: Tim Strickland 3 under question  (Read 594 times)

Offline razorback

  • Trad Bowhunter
  • **
  • Posts: 2166
Tim Strickland 3 under question
« on: December 14, 2010, 07:43:00 AM »
Just watched an episode of Strictlands hunting Adventures, where Tim took a nice Kudu in Africa. I noticed that he was shooting 3 under and that the arrow was a good finger width above his top finger. Anybody else shoot this way or know why he does. He is better than I am ever likely to be and since I just started shooting 3 under thought I would try to find the merit in it. I figure it brings the arrow closer to his eye making for easier "aiming"
Any thoughts.
Keep the wind in your face and the sun at your back.

Offline BTW

  • Trad Bowhunter
  • **
  • Posts: 98
Re: Tim Strickland 3 under question
« Reply #1 on: December 14, 2010, 08:45:00 AM »
He might be gap shooting.  Gap is determined by the distance of the target.

Offline razorback

  • Trad Bowhunter
  • **
  • Posts: 2166
Re: Tim Strickland 3 under question
« Reply #2 on: December 14, 2010, 08:58:00 AM »
Probably is gap shooting and, if i have it right, the closer the arrow is to the eye the smaller the gap at the target.
Seems like the tiller of the bow would have to be taken into account with the string pressure so far below the nock point.
Keep the wind in your face and the sun at your back.

Offline Onehair

  • Trad Bowhunter
  • **
  • Posts: 593
Re: Tim Strickland 3 under question
« Reply #3 on: December 14, 2010, 10:11:00 AM »
Not gap, string walking.

Offline Manitoba Stickflinger

  • SPONSOR
  • Trad Bowhunter
  • *****
  • Posts: 1944
Re: Tim Strickland 3 under question
« Reply #4 on: December 14, 2010, 10:21:00 AM »
Likely string walking!

Offline Fritz

  • Trad Bowhunter
  • **
  • Posts: 1601
Re: Tim Strickland 3 under question
« Reply #5 on: December 14, 2010, 10:49:00 AM »
I shoot almost exactly the same. I wear glasses and can't use a high anchor. Been shooting like that the past three yrs. I use a clicker. Tuning is a little more challenging than other styles, but it works very well for me.  I don't walk the string. I find my point on distance of 15-18 yrds and that's where I grip the string for every shot. Short bows are hard to tune with this style of shooting.
God is good, all the time!!!

Offline BTW

  • Trad Bowhunter
  • **
  • Posts: 98
Re: Tim Strickland 3 under question
« Reply #6 on: December 14, 2010, 11:23:00 AM »
How does string walking work?

Offline Fritz

  • Trad Bowhunter
  • **
  • Posts: 1601
Re: Tim Strickland 3 under question
« Reply #7 on: December 14, 2010, 11:29:00 AM »
Basically, you have different places on the string you grip the string for different yardages. Do a search on the Shooters Forum. I know there is plenty of info. on it.
God is good, all the time!!!

Offline bigbadjon

  • Trad Bowhunter
  • **
  • Posts: 1472
Re: Tim Strickland 3 under question
« Reply #8 on: December 14, 2010, 11:31:00 AM »
String walking changes the load of your bow to change the point of aim of your arrow. I use a dumbed down version by using 3 under out to 30 yards then switching to split finger. Its an accurate system if you thrive on quantifiable variables.
Hoyt Tiburon 55#@28 64in
A&H ACS CX 61#@28in 68in (rip 8/3/14)

Offline R. W. Mackey

  • Trad Bowhunter
  • **
  • Posts: 561
Re: Tim Strickland 3 under question
« Reply #9 on: December 14, 2010, 11:48:00 AM »
String walking is a very old method of aiming that alot of people use for NFAA type tournaments, where the yardage is known. The difference between string walking and gap shooting is: String walking, the point of arrow is held dead on each shot and the finger position on the string is moved up and down.  with gap shooting, the point of arow is moved up or down and the hand position stays the same. I am not an expert on either method since i shoot instinctive, and I am sure there is alot more to it than that, but this is basically how it works.
Don't practice until you get something RIGHT.  Practice until you Can't do it WRONG.  Dave Rorem

Offline TDHunter

  • Trad Bowhunter
  • **
  • Posts: 555
Re: Tim Strickland 3 under question
« Reply #10 on: December 14, 2010, 11:58:00 AM »
make sure your bow is tillered for it if your going to shoot that way.

Offline Bowwild

  • TG HALL OF FAME
  • Trad Bowhunter
  • *****
  • Posts: 5433
Re: Tim Strickland 3 under question
« Reply #11 on: December 14, 2010, 06:26:00 PM »
Yes, he is string walking.  I started shooting the same way in early August after watching his DVD. Added 10 yards to my effective range  within a week.  Following Tim's lead I measure about an index finger width (trial and error) down from a nocked arrow. I then serve a nock locator that is this width below the nock. That's the 20-yard finger placement. I then serve about half that width further down and that's the under 15 yard distance. I use different thickness and color serving thread to help with locating the fingers. Finger touching the nock is a 30-yard spot if looking at the heart.

The primary nock locator is 1/2" above level.

I gap shot before doing this. I called it instinctive but it wasn't.

Offline AJP66

  • Trad Bowhunter
  • **
  • Posts: 19
Re: Tim Strickland 3 under question
« Reply #12 on: December 14, 2010, 08:50:00 PM »
I have been stringwalking since july, just amazing how accurate you can be. Masters of the barebow 2, and Modern Traditional DVDs have some good info on stringwalking.

Offline Bjorn

  • Trad Bowhunter
  • **
  • Posts: 8789
Re: Tim Strickland 3 under question
« Reply #13 on: December 14, 2010, 09:19:00 PM »
I had the opportunity to shoot 3D with a world class competitor and stringwalker twice in the past year. And had the technique explained in detail, it is indeed impressive with it's accuracy. But it has its limitations too; you gotta' be a master at judging distance. Personally I don't have an interest; but to each his own.

Offline razorback

  • Trad Bowhunter
  • **
  • Posts: 2166
Re: Tim Strickland 3 under question
« Reply #14 on: December 14, 2010, 09:21:00 PM »
Thanks guys. Never heard of string walking but will be looking into it. i am revamping my shooting style so am in a good spot to try something new. I have a bear grizzly 58" 55#@28, will this bow work with string walking or does it have to be tillered specially for this style.
Keep the wind in your face and the sun at your back.

Offline macksdad

  • Trad Bowhunter
  • **
  • Posts: 619
Re: Tim Strickland 3 under question
« Reply #15 on: December 14, 2010, 10:49:00 PM »
I shoot three under, I like the stringwalking theory alot.
Hoyt Buffalo   #45@28,#50@28, #55 @28, #60@28
Hill Country Wildcat 52#@28
Hill Country Wildcat Static #57@31
Rick Welch Accuracy Factory

Offline 3undr

  • Trad Bowhunter
  • **
  • Posts: 101
Re: Tim Strickland 3 under question
« Reply #16 on: December 15, 2010, 07:17:00 AM »
i shoot 3 under and as far as shooting your bear this way, sure you can but it will be more noisy than split. some of us knock at 5/8 high instead of 1/2 but that really depends on the bow also.i have no interest in string walking 3 under is just more natural for me.

Offline AJP66

  • Trad Bowhunter
  • **
  • Posts: 19
Re: Tim Strickland 3 under question
« Reply #17 on: December 15, 2010, 08:34:00 AM »
Just a few tips if anyone wants to try stringwalking, you definatly need two nock locators one above and one below the arrow, a little higher than normal,on some bows almost 3/4". To keep your bow quiet keep your brace hieght on the high side for your bow. For hunting I like to use dental floss to mark my most common string crawl, that way I can feel where I need to grip the string without taking my eyes off the animal.

Users currently browsing this topic:

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
 

Contact Us | Trad Gang.com © | User Agreement

Copyright 2003 thru 2024 ~ Trad Gang.com ©