Well part of the reason I am looking at the glue in / glue on adapters is because of strength. I have broken and bent screw in aluminum adapters on Zwickeys (did not come with the Zwickeys - they may have been junk) and was wondering if this might be the best solution strength wise.
Whip - That is why I was using the 100 grain brass inserts and 125 grain stingers. That system works great for me and I have not had any problems with it. In fact I love the modularity of it and I have yet to break or damage a Stinger - that point refuses to curl and I have curled a number of other heads. Great. See what you did - I almost have myself talked into not changing anything!
Rob - that is the other choice I was considering. Using steel adapters and broadheads with the standard aluminum insert would yield arrows of about the same price as the glue in / on adapters. I was a little nervous about the quality of the steel adapters because there was some complaining last year about the 75 grain steel adapters breaking and other weights bending. I have bent some aluminum inserts in the past, but i think the fact that I foot my arrows could solve that problem. I have a LOT of those aluminum inserts around since I have been using the brass inserts for a while now and the aluminum ones come with the arrows for free.
Longstykes - I am trying to go LESS expensive here. Titanium sounds spendy :eek: :D Have you had good luck with the 75 grain adapters?
Thanks for all of the replies. With all of the extra shooting and roving my wife and I have been doing the arrow cost is starting to add up!