3Rivers Archery



The Trad Gang Digital Market













Contribute to Trad Gang and Access the Classifieds!

Become a Trad Gang Sponsor!

Traditional Archery for Bowhunters






LEFT HAND BOWS CLASSIFIEDS TRAD GANG CLASSIFIEDS ACCESS RIGHT HAND BOWS CLASSIFIEDS


Author Topic: Landshark vs Treeshark  (Read 405 times)

Offline TURKEYFOOTGIRL

  • Trad Bowhunter
  • **
  • Posts: 663
Re: Landshark vs Treeshark
« Reply #20 on: December 09, 2011, 11:43:00 PM »
Ive used the tigersharks and love em. Never seen so much blood spilled with a two blade.  Every shark seems to fly dead on as long as they spin true which isnt a problem.
"Life's too short for ugly bows n arrows" Chris B

Offline Gehrke145

  • Trad Bowhunter
  • **
  • Posts: 875
Re: Landshark vs Treeshark
« Reply #21 on: December 10, 2011, 12:57:00 PM »
Hard to beat the tree sharks, amazing head!  They shoot great for me, 3 5 inch dura vanes, no problem out to 40.

Offline Randy Morin

  • Trad Bowhunter
  • **
  • Posts: 1235
Re: Landshark vs Treeshark
« Reply #22 on: December 10, 2011, 01:00:00 PM »
I killed my Bull Elk this past September with 160 Glue-on Interceptor (non-vented) and then a Antelope buck with a 135 (vented) glue on Tiger-Shark. Last night I shot a WT doe with the Interceptor.  Had a great blood trail which was nice because I only sliced the bottom /back of the heart and got one lung so she went a ways.  My only negative is I dont like the noise (call it a whooosh) that all vented heads seem to make.  So I prefer the Non-vented glue on 160 Interceptor.  I think it may be the best of the bunch.  In flight...it is night and day difference between the noise these two heads make.  Game alarming noise!!!

My arrows are around 550 gn.  Bow is 54 lbs @29".  Steel broadhead adapters are used in 100 or 125 to make a 250 gn head plus aluminum insert.
Also...the 160 gn Interceptors actually weigh 150 although the owner said he may get them back to an actual 160 in the future.  Something in the grind etc reduced weight from the past heads. No big deal.  I like the 150 final weight anyway.

Offline jonsimoneau

  • Trad Bowhunter
  • **
  • Posts: 2946
Re: Landshark vs Treeshark
« Reply #23 on: December 10, 2011, 04:57:00 PM »
ive been playing around with the big treesharks, and have not noticed any noise with them.

Offline Landshark160

  • Trad Bowhunter
  • **
  • Posts: 672
Re: Landshark vs Treeshark
« Reply #24 on: December 10, 2011, 07:01:00 PM »
I've shot Simmons heads since 1990, and have never noticed noise from any head, be it Interceptor, Landshark, Tigershark, or Treeshark.  Even out of compounds at around 270 fps.  I've also shot the original Interceptors, and Safaris, which aren't vented, and can't tell any difference in the sound.
Chris
>>>>--------------->

The benefits of a big broadhead are most evident when things go wrong. - CTS

Online varmint101

  • TG HALL OF FAME
  • Trad Bowhunter
  • *****
  • Posts: 2777
Re: Landshark vs Treeshark
« Reply #25 on: December 10, 2011, 09:39:00 PM »
No noise from my Tigersharks either.  Sweet heads!
Bless The Lord, O My Soul!

Member:
Indiana Bowhunter Association
Compton Traditional Bowhunters
Professional Bowhunters Society

Offline Clint B.

  • Contributing Member
  • Trad Bowhunter
  • ****
  • Posts: 329
Re: Landshark vs Treeshark
« Reply #26 on: December 10, 2011, 10:05:00 PM »
Don't forget about the new TigerShark 175 gr. screw-in.    http://simmonssharks.com

Online elkken

  • Contributing Member
  • Trad Bowhunter
  • ****
  • Posts: 3922
Re: Landshark vs Treeshark
« Reply #27 on: December 10, 2011, 10:23:00 PM »
I have hunted the Land Shark, Tree Shark, and Tiger Shark ... great heads and I do not hear any noise. The Simmons Steel Master is a great sharpening tool, even I can get a scary sharp edge on my Sharks with it, and I suck at sharpening !! For me much better than the steel eating wheelie sharpener, I really suck at that thing.
Sometimes it's better to be lucky than good

TGMM Family of the Bow

Offline TURKEYFOOTGIRL

  • Trad Bowhunter
  • **
  • Posts: 663
Re: Landshark vs Treeshark
« Reply #28 on: December 11, 2011, 12:38:00 AM »
Just got to shootin some 2inch tree sharks today and they flew absolutely awesome!  With one doe tag left I cant wait to see the red snow!
"Life's too short for ugly bows n arrows" Chris B

Offline TRADARROW71

  • Trad Bowhunter
  • **
  • Posts: 22
Re: Landshark vs Treeshark
« Reply #29 on: December 11, 2011, 01:53:00 AM »
I switched to Treesharks, and I've never been disappointed with them.  They leave some big holes!!

Offline Joe Subler

  • Trad Bowhunter
  • **
  • Posts: 258
Re: Landshark vs Treeshark
« Reply #30 on: December 11, 2011, 08:13:00 AM »
Their cost is not bad either!!

Joe
62" Mohawk  53#@27"

Users currently browsing this topic:

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
 

Contact Us | Trad Gang.com © | User Agreement

Copyright 2003 thru 2024 ~ Trad Gang.com ©