Here in illinois on a special hunt they had us do a proficiency test, "pie plate" at 20 yards. Keep this in mind was a special small area the state opened up for control and monitored by UofI.
So, I show up with my longbow on one of the days there are 15 of us, and yes I am the only trad guy. We shot 5 arrows, then the conservation guy scored them, they all had to be in the "plate". Out of the 15 of us me and three others did it. This shocked me!! So, of course the others threw a fit and said only takes one arrow. So, they decided to reschedule. I threw a fit! "What is the purpose of having proficiency test if you change the rules? What do us three get for passing the right way?" "Well, we have to have so many hunters and need to make it fair" Conversation response. "What about fair to the game!!!, Are you guys going to check on those hunters tackle to ensure they are using the same stuff they Qualified with. Because I tell you, they will come with small arrows, and target bows to qualify, they go to there "hunting bow". The answer, "Nope, as long as they get the numbers, which we will probably lower it to 3, that is all that matters. I then had my say and never went back. This is why states set minimum laws for equipent and weapons to harvest game. Because they don't want to regulate it and do what needs done. I kind agree, a hunter has to have the ethics to be proficient with the weapon, but they also need to be teaching that to children in school.