another arrow selection question

[Kamm1004]

Hey guys, I just recently got a new bow. Two tracks ambush 60@28. I want to shoot wood, just love the way wood flies. Anyways I recently read a comment from a fellow trad ganger about the rule of 5. Basically for my setup i'd start at 60-65 spined arrows. Add 5 for fast flight string, so that'd put me at 65-70. add another 5 for being center cut, or in my case almost cut to center, and thats 70-75 with 125gr points. If i want to use say 160gr points i'd add another 5 in spine.
Does this sound right guys? I have a test kit right now and really like the way the 70-75 arrows shoot from this bow and also like the 75-80 arrows. My question is which to order? I want to order one dozen that i can use for everything. I'm gonna hunt hogs this september, deer this fall, and want to use them for elk and other large game. So should i order the 75-80 in order to increase overall arrow weight and penetration or stay with 70-75 and 125gr points?
Sorry if this is confusing guys, hopefully someone can help.

[Fletcher]

Shoot them thru paper from about 6 feet and you will know which spine is best.  It is really hard to "see" perfect arrow flight, your eye can't pick them up before the fletch straightens them.

[cedar]

Keep in mind that your broadheads will weaken the spine some.

[Kamm1004]

Fletcher, thanks for the advice! Sounds like a great idea. What should i look for though?  I know you want a clean perfectly round hole, but what do i do or what does it mean if the nock end or tail end is kicking or swinging left or right or up or down?

John49, thats why i was thinking about going with the heavier spined arrows so i could afford to put more weight up front for penetration purpposes

[cedar]

You need to read the following on paper tuning:  http://www.texasarchery.org/BoardMembers/RickStonebrakerPages/TuningForTens/TuningForTens.htm
There's alittle too much there is try to explain.

[cedar]

I'm not sure that the previous post will work.  Just google 'Tuning for tens by Rick Stonebraker'.