Hi Bullfrog.
If you're shooting 40#+, drawing 27"+, and keeping your shots 20yds ( all could have "or so" added to em) and under you'll be good.
Both of your choices are good heads for sure.
I'd choose whichever one I could get sharper.
I've heard the accusharp works on simmons just fine.
I know an accusharp can get a head darn sharp from personal experience.
A 3 blade almost needs some stones to sharpen them.
After I learned how to sharpen a 3 blade quickly,easily, and scary sharp I switched to them.
In my compound days a killed a number of deer with 2,3, and 4 blade heads.
I preferred the holes,penetration, and trails I got with 3 blades. None of the 2 blades I used were BIG though. They were all(2,3,&4's) around 1.25"
One way I like to compare heads of 2 or 3 blade design is this...
Say you have a 2" 2 blade. It has 2" of cut. Pretty simple..
Now let's say you have a 1 1/8" VPA 3 blade.
If you figure each blade cuts the radius of that 1.125" hole. so 1.125" ÷ 2 = 0.5625"
Then take that radial distance and multiply by 3
0.5623"x3=1.6875"
So even with a "small" 3 blade you still have 1.6875" of cutting going on.
Now I KNOW that holes rip and open up and nothing is this exact when hunting.
BUT critters only bleed from where they're cut.
Makes that 3 blade not seem so small anymore.
I like the thought the smaller profile of the 3 blade is less likely to steer the arrow around in the wind, bad release, or just improperly mounted.
The simmons with their fairly unique design are less prone to those problems than other WIDE 2 blades.
Most of this stuff is just mental games I play.
But it gives me some confidence and I like it..lol