I have carbons, aluminums, and woods. I use wood mostly during hunting season. I find that longbows shoot wood just as well as anything else and with some shots, wood seems to have more forgiveness. The best thing I like about woods is that my small game arrows, my stump shooting arrows and my broadheads all react the same, because they are are the same. The problem with carbon is the per shaft price. I hate it when dollar signs flash in my head when I am shooting at a pheasant. I do not buy the price argument. I have wood arrows that are ten years old and more that are still in target use and in my quiver with broadheads and blunts. Not all shaft suppliers are equal, I have had shafts that were not of consistent quality. I shoot tapered cedars and do not have a problem keeping them straight or flying just as accurate as my carbons and aluminums. I have found that quite often when someone is having problems with wood shafts is that they are the wrong spine or set up wrong. While a full length carbon may fly for a person, guessing which spine wood to shoot gets complictaed when one insist on shooting arrows with a lot of extra length. When someone wants arrows from me, I need to watch them shoot. I give them arrows absolutely so longer than needed and if they have a soft creeping release, I want that fixed before I make any arrows. For guys with Hill style bows, I see lots of guys that claim to have a 28" draw, but release at 26". If they buy arrows to match that 28" and then give a few pounds extra, their arrows will fly loggy. Carbons are of course more consistent and stiff, but as a bow hunter only, there is an advantage to using one shaft style for all of the various hunts. I will admit that I get a guilty feeling when I lose an aluminum or carbon in the wild. Losing a wood arrow is in the long run less litter. Wood is also warmer on the index finger and quieter in the quiver. After saying all that, tomorrow I am going out with a quiver full ancient Acme cedars and original Grizzlies.