3Rivers Archery



The Trad Gang Digital Market













Contribute to Trad Gang and Access the Classifieds!

Become a Trad Gang Sponsor!

Traditional Archery for Bowhunters






LEFT HAND BOWS CLASSIFIEDS TRAD GANG CLASSIFIEDS ACCESS RIGHT HAND BOWS CLASSIFIEDS


Author Topic: micarta density vs. more dense woods??  (Read 652 times)

Offline Matt Green

  • Trad Bowhunter
  • **
  • Posts: 261
micarta density vs. more dense woods??
« on: February 07, 2014, 03:33:00 PM »
What about it.  What is the density of micarta and how does it compare to some of the woods like ebony and I think kingwood is fairly dense too.

wondering if a bow could be build as heavy with an all wood riser as with an all micarta like the Bob Lee Heavyweight and ultimate.
any input is appreciated.
matt G
"If God didn't make an outside, I wouldn't have fun." Summer - my 4 year old daughter

Online Friend

  • TG HALL OF FAME
  • Trad Bowhunter
  • *****
  • Posts: 8103
Re: micarta density vs. more dense woods??
« Reply #1 on: February 07, 2014, 07:41:00 PM »
Just some estimates

Snakewood…………………….81  lbs/cuft
Micarta.…………………………78 ibs/cuft
Leadwood……………………...76 lbs/cuft
Kingwood……………………..75 lbs/cuft
Blackwood African………….75 lbs/cuft
Cocobolo………………………68 lbs/cuft
Ebony Macassar……………...68 lbs/cuft
Ipe..……………………………66-75 lbs/cuft
Desert Ironwood……………..66 lbs/cuft
Curupay……………………….65 lbs/cuft
Macawood……………………64 lbs/cuft
Ebony………………………….63 lbs/cuft
Dymondwood………………..60-75 lbs/cuft
Marblewood………………….62 lbs/cuft
>>----> Friend <----<<

My Lands… Are Where My Dead Lie Buried.......Crazy Horse

Offline Sixby

  • Tradbowhunter
  • Trad Bowhunter
  • *
  • Posts: 2941
Re: micarta density vs. more dense woods??
« Reply #2 on: February 08, 2014, 12:37:00 AM »
Before building a bow with an all phenolic rise talk to some people that own them. I have heard quite a few negative comments from people with phenolic risers that say that they transfer vibration a lot more than wood does. I too believe that. Its one reason I use a combination on most bows of phenolic and wood instead of all phenolic. Wood dampens and kills vibration better IMHO.
I would imagine some will contradict this and that's alright but its my experience and the complaints were not about my solid phenolic bows.
Anyway you might check it out. I do like using a phenolic I beam in the riser.

God bless, Steve

Offline TOEJAMMER

  • Trad Bowhunter
  • **
  • Posts: 730
Re: micarta density vs. more dense woods??
« Reply #3 on: February 08, 2014, 02:04:00 AM »
Steve,  I'm no expert and can only comment on my personal experience.  I have many all wood recurves and longbows and have/had only two phenolic riser recurves.  Both are Cascade Nighthawk 3 piece recurves.  One 58# at 28 and  58 inch and the other 63# at 29 and 52 inch.   They have no vibration at all.  I suspect a lot has to do with design etc.  As I stated, only my experience with two bows.

Offline ghoster808

  • Trad Bowhunter
  • **
  • Posts: 60
Re: micarta density vs. more dense woods??
« Reply #4 on: February 08, 2014, 11:53:00 AM »
Never built a bow, but have scaled a lot of knives. Desert ironwood lives up to it's name! One of the only woods that doesn't need to be stabilized, IIRC it doesn't take well to that process anyway. The lb/cf chart doesn't show it as being the densest but I'm willing to bet its one of, if not the hardest.
"Till The Wheels Fall Off"

Offline ghoster808

  • Trad Bowhunter
  • **
  • Posts: 60
Re: micarta density vs. more dense woods??
« Reply #5 on: February 08, 2014, 11:53:00 AM »
Never built a bow, but have scaled a lot of knives. Desert ironwood lives up to it's name! One of the only woods that doesn't need to be stabilized, IIRC it doesn't take well to that process anyway. The lb/cf chart doesn't show it as being the densest but I'm willing to bet its one of, if not the hardest.
"Till The Wheels Fall Off"

Offline YORNOC

  • Trad Bowhunter
  • **
  • Posts: 2993
Re: micarta density vs. more dense woods??
« Reply #6 on: February 08, 2014, 01:35:00 PM »
I love a heavy bow. I bought two blocks of Lignum Vitae,(heaviest, densest wood in the world) a few years ago but have not used it yet. I'm dying to try it out in a riser, its nothing special to look at, so I may have it as a flair.
It is becoming very rare.
I have a friend who used to work for Bear, he said that the 1968+ phenolic bows always showed a lot more stress in the limbs and finish than the wood bows.
But as Toejammer said, technology has come a long way.
David M. Conroy

Offline Pheonixarcher

  • Trad Bowhunter
  • **
  • Posts: 1224
Re: micarta density vs. more dense woods??
« Reply #7 on: February 08, 2014, 01:40:00 PM »
That's a great chart Friend! Thanks for sharing it.
Plant a fruit or nut tree today, and have good hunting tomorrow.
=}}}}}-----------------------------}>

Offline TxAg

  • Trad Bowhunter
  • **
  • Posts: 2910
Re: micarta density vs. more dense woods??
« Reply #8 on: February 08, 2014, 02:32:00 PM »
I have a bow coming with African Blackwood as the main riser wood. I'm looking forward to a little extra mass, and i love a dark colored bow.

Offline Bowwild

  • TG HALL OF FAME
  • Trad Bowhunter
  • *****
  • Posts: 5433
Re: micarta density vs. more dense woods??
« Reply #9 on: February 08, 2014, 03:23:00 PM »
I bought a Stalker Schleyer on the classifieds here a couple of weeks ago. (Great bow and super seller--without a doubt the best all around purchase I've made on the classifieds in 4 years).

That bow's riser is Snakewood with an Ebony Flare. It is the most hefty bow I've shot and I love the feel.

Users currently browsing this topic:

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
 

Contact Us | Trad Gang.com © | User Agreement

Copyright 2003 thru 2024 ~ Trad Gang.com ©