my tuning saga continues.....
long story short, i sold a bow and bought a new one. the 400 axis arrows i had for the old one weren't flying as good as i liked anyway and they were worse with the new bow, 1# heavier and lots more efficient. tried 340's and no good.
desparation led me to 500's. intially this made a big difference but now i'm doubting whether they are the go or not.
i trimmed and tested the 500's from full length to too short and never could quite get consistent good flight.
i tried paper tuning again for the 1st time in years and i find with the 500's i'm getting a combo of high left tears. (10 o'clock) i've moved the nock point everywhere from about an 1" to 5/16" and it tears high all the time. i managed to correct the left tear by putting a 425gr point on it for a total of 525 upfront with the 100gr insert. with less point weight than this the left tears get worse as you drop weight. now isn't left tear supposed to be weak? then why does making it weaker get rid of the left tear?
out of curiousity i tried the original 400 spine arrow i used to shoot which i originally couldn't get to fly right and just to frustrate me more they fly good and nearly give bullet holes i paper.
now i'm thinking of going back to them because now they fly consistently good. maybe some how my form has evoved during my 6 months or more of trying to get everything tuned and this makes them fly good now.
here's the weird thing i don't understand.
the 500 is about an inch shorter than the 400, which is 30", yet it needs 525gr up front to get rid of left tears. even with 100gr points the 500 gives worse left tears. i can not get a right tear with them.
i played with point weight on the 400 and i can move the tear left and right with changes in point weight and up and down with nock height. i can't get rid of nock high tears with the 500, it takes huge weight upfront to get rid of nock left tears and i've never got a nock right tear with them.