Black Widow PCH or PSA

[WndWker]

Lookin to buy a PCH or PSA pros and cons of each ? I've had a PSA before, just wondering how the PCH handles comparied to the PSA. Thanks.

[McDave]

The PSA was originally conceived as a shorter alternative to the PMA. The PCH was recently conceived as a shorter alternative to the PSA.  So it just depends on how short of a bow you want. A longer bow will shoot more accurately, but that won't do you any good if you're in a position where you can't get a shot off.

[jkm97]

In addition the PCH has a shorter sight window, which might be a factor depending on shooting style, and its cut 1/8" past center compared to the PSA 3/16".

You can get a longer working limb in the same overall length bow with the PCH versus the PSA.

[ranger 3]

I've had a PCH and didn't like the short site window but shot as good as the PSA, I have a PLX and PSR and I am very satisfied with both.

[Blackhawk]

I've owned both, but still have the PCH in 58"...and like it better.

[Terry Lightle]

Shoot a 58 inch PCH,do not think it gets any better

[Arctic Hunter]

I have a 30" draw, so a minimum of a 60"-62" bow is necessary for me. I like the taller sight window on my PSA due to the fact I shoot split and have a lower anchor than most. I also don't always cant the bow much, which is where the longer sight window really helps. With the shorter window, I find myself really canting the bow more than usuall. Never liked having to do that in a stand.

[Dave W]

I own both.  A 60" PSA and a 58" PCH same weight.  I draw almost 30".  I shoot both interchangeably but if I had to pick just one, it would be the PSA.  I can get it to shoot more quietly and it seems to be a bit more forgiving.  Both are awesome bows and you will be happy choosing either one.

DW

[Friend]

Have owned both...both were excellent.

Blinds, tighter cover...I would choose the PCH and had no issues reaching out if need be... personally shot competently to 35 yards...quite accommodating.

The PSA is excellent and seemed to personally extend my effective range by over five yards.

[KAZ]

I think both are sweet... PCH is lighter with longer working limbs & shorter riser/sight window allowing for shorter bow if you need mobility and still be smooth. PSA is heavier, shorter working limbs & larger riser/sight window  making it a little more stable. Totally preference on what priorities you place in your bow. Both are sweet! Can't go wrong... :-)

[Tedd]

I have a PCH and use it constantly. It's handled a lot of shots. I have a 31.5" draw and use the 60" PCH. Honestly I have never had a bow that draws so smooth out to my draw length. Most times the accuracy is pretty good.
I would prefer a little less bulk in the riser. That is the only thing I would change.
Tedd

[Stump73]

The  Pch is a shooter.

[Steelhead]

If you wanted to shoot a widow a couple inches shorter and with less mass weight the PCH gets the nod.

If you want more mass weight and a bit more length the PSA might get the nod.

Its a pretty close call really.

[ron w]

I like a PCH 60" long. Long working limb shoots very well for me. I have had a PSA and a PMA, all great bows just depends on your likes and needs.

[widow sax]

You can not say anything bad about either of them I have 2 CHX and one SAX I like my CHX the best. Mine does not have the phenolic in them so they drop the P in the model name.   Widow

[Benny Nganabbarru]

Have owned and hunted with both. Both are excellent. I had a 62" PSA and still have a 60" PCH. Fine bows. Never noticed a sight window on any bow, no matter how long or short.