3Rivers Archery



The Trad Gang Digital Market













Contribute to Trad Gang and Access the Classifieds!

Become a Trad Gang Sponsor!

Traditional Archery for Bowhunters






LEFT HAND BOWS CLASSIFIEDS TRAD GANG CLASSIFIEDS ACCESS RIGHT HAND BOWS CLASSIFIEDS


Author Topic: Miller vs schulz  (Read 414 times)

Offline Dan bree

  • Trad Bowhunter
  • **
  • Posts: 521
Miller vs schulz
« on: December 31, 2014, 01:48:00 PM »
Hey guys . Do you think a miller all bamboo will shoot and feel the same as one of johns bows. . I know Dave was a student of johns  so it should be the same . But I read someware that John put a little something in his that he didn't tell anybody. .?
Dan Breen

Online Orion

  • TG HALL OF FAME
  • Trad Bowhunter
  • *****
  • Posts: 8252
  • Contributing Member
Re: Miller vs schulz
« Reply #1 on: December 31, 2014, 05:11:00 PM »
Huh?  They're glass and bamboo or wood. I assume either will put carbon into the limbs if you want it. One may be tapered a bit different than the other, or the lamination or glass thicknesses and widths may be somewhat different, but there's no secret ingredient (but nice marketing if you can get people to believe there is).    :bigsmyl:

  • Guest
Re: Miller vs schulz
« Reply #2 on: December 31, 2014, 05:50:00 PM »
It is way more fun to think that there is a magic involved. Only a real killjoy would think that personal adaptations  and adjustments calibrated with exacting standards which developed over a period of years of objective analysis would be at the heart of it.  But then looking at the pics of the first four, I notice that there are slight variations in the fadeouts. Then there is the comment stated that no two bows will shoot exactly alike, by John, which is correct. That leaves it up to the complex category of art, an immeasurable quantity of innovation, inspiration, craftsmanship, and luck.

Offline Green

  • Trad Bowhunter
  • **
  • Posts: 3003
Re: Miller vs schulz
« Reply #3 on: December 31, 2014, 06:03:00 PM »
Pavan - you DO have a way with words.     :D
ASL's, Selfbows, and Wood Arra's
Just because you are passionate about something, doesn't mean you don't suck at it.

Offline nineworlds9

  • Trad Bowhunter
  • **
  • Posts: 4605
  • Northman
Re: Miller vs schulz
« Reply #4 on: December 31, 2014, 06:27:00 PM »
I would think there would be a difference regardless of whether John passed on every single thing he knew to David.  The human aspect cannot be denied- different hands, tactile sense, different set of eyes, different emotions and intuitions.  Testing of all types cannot find any difference between the sound quality of a Stradivarius vs of a violin made by a modern day master luthier, and yet folks will pay tens of millions of $ for a Stradivarius because they are convinced it is magical.  Personally, I think they are a little magical seeing as they were constructed in the 18th century with only hand tools and a knowledge set not all that far removed from the Dark Ages.  I think ultimately comparing a Schulz and a Miller is unfair, both bowyers have mastered their craft, one passed on his legacy to the next.  I can only hope that someone out there takes up where David leaves off someday.  

Pavan nailed it.
52" Texas Recurve
58" Two Tracks Ogemaw
60" Toelke Chinook
62" Tall Tines Stickflinger
64" Big Jim Mountain Monarch
64" Poison Dart LB
66" Wes Wallace Royal
            
Horse Creek TAC, GA
TBOF

Offline Trad Longbow Joe

  • Trad Bowhunter
  • **
  • Posts: 199
Re: Miller vs schulz
« Reply #5 on: December 31, 2014, 06:56:00 PM »
I would think David's Hawk with the curved bamboo would shoot differently than John's all bamboo model.  Just my guess because I don't own either, but I do own one of John's American Longbows with fiberglass and one of David's Expedition Longbows with carbon.  Both shoot very similar to each other, but a slight edge on speed tested thru a chronograph to the Expedition.

  • Guest
Re: Miller vs schulz
« Reply #6 on: December 31, 2014, 07:07:00 PM »
When those carbon backed Expeditions were coming out, I heard about it soon enough to be one of the first ones, I just cannot believe that I did not jump all of over one.  By the time I tried, the list was too long for my patience.

Offline Trad Longbow Joe

  • Trad Bowhunter
  • **
  • Posts: 199
Re: Miller vs schulz
« Reply #7 on: December 31, 2014, 07:27:00 PM »
It took eight months when I ordered mine and during the whole time I wasn't sure if I would have David make me a Hawk or an Expedition.  Finally decided to go with the expedition for longer life, I like to shoot a lot.  I certainly think it is one of my finest bows and it is a real looker!

Offline Rossco7002

  • Trad Bowhunter
  • **
  • Posts: 1697
Re: Miller vs schulz
« Reply #8 on: December 31, 2014, 07:33:00 PM »
Haha.. Same for me. FWIW - I owned a Schulz all bamboo and it was a real joy to shoot, as I suspect David's are. My feeling is that the character of each bow would be defined more by the individuality of the wood more than differences between each bowyers "technique" - looking at their offerings side by side the lineage and resemblance is readily apparent.
HHA Half Breed 52@28
David Miller 'Old Tom' - coming soon
John Schulz American Longbow 65@28
David Miller 'The Expedition' 55@26

Offline Hud

  • Contributing Member
  • Trad Bowhunter
  • ****
  • Posts: 2233
  • 360-921-5779
Re: Miller vs schulz
« Reply #9 on: December 31, 2014, 11:51:00 PM »
I own both, and can see differences between them, characteristics that identify the bowyer.
TGMM Family of the Bow

Offline Wudstix

  • TG HALL OF FAME
  • Trad Bowhunter
  • *****
  • Posts: 6299
  • Wood arrows & D/R Longbows Rule!!!
Re: Miller vs schulz
« Reply #10 on: January 01, 2015, 10:01:00 PM »
They should both be close.
"If you're not living on the edge, you're taking up too much space!!!" - Me

Psalms 121: 1-3 - King David

60" Big River 67#@28"              
60" MOAB D/R LB 62#@27"
60" Big River D/R LB 65#@27"
62" Kota Badlands LB 72#@28"
62" Howatt TD 62#@28
58” Bear Grizzly 70#@28”
62" Big River D/R LB 60#@30"
66" Moosejaw Razorback LB 60#@28"

"Memento Mori"
PBS - Associate Member
Retired DoD Civ 1985-2019

  • Guest
Re: Miller vs schulz
« Reply #11 on: January 02, 2015, 09:45:00 AM »
Jan. 5 is the starting date to bid on the Schulz bows.  My son says there should be some sports style betting spread to see which one goes for the most and for how much.  He is a CPA and thinks of stuff like that, I do know anything about gambling or approve of it, but hey, I've got a change jar.  Megamilions and Powerball here I come, I got a better chance of getting struck by lightening on a cold winter day than I do of winning the lottery and buying up all of those Schulz bows. But if I did, I would only keep one for myself and give the rest away to those that would hunt with one until it was wore out.  It would be an insult to John to not use it.

Offline Pat B.

  • Trad Bowhunter
  • **
  • Posts: 2495
Re: Miller vs schulz
« Reply #12 on: January 02, 2015, 09:53:00 AM »
Pavan, where will the action be held ?

I found the site, thanks

  • Guest
Re: Miller vs schulz
« Reply #13 on: January 02, 2015, 09:57:00 AM »
Edunk,

Offline Hud

  • Contributing Member
  • Trad Bowhunter
  • ****
  • Posts: 2233
  • 360-921-5779
Re: Miller vs schulz
« Reply #14 on: January 03, 2015, 02:04:00 PM »
The auction is used to determine highest price, early,   :confused:  and does so by flushing out those with deep pockets.   :biglaugh:
TGMM Family of the Bow

Offline SquareHead

  • Trad Bowhunter
  • **
  • Posts: 60
Re: Miller vs schulz
« Reply #15 on: January 03, 2015, 02:38:00 PM »
Does anybody have any opinion, or experience, on how these last bows will shoot?  I have shot a number of Hill style bows before.  They were nice bows, but I didn't care for the hand shock.  With this being sting follow bows, I wonder how much hand shock one will feel.  Would appreciate any opinions.  I am looking at one of the lighter bows such as the 48#.

Thanks,

Chris

Users currently browsing this topic:

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
 

Contact Us | Trad Gang.com © | User Agreement

Copyright 2003 thru 2024 ~ Trad Gang.com ©