3Rivers Archery



The Trad Gang Digital Market













Contribute to Trad Gang and Access the Classifieds!

Become a Trad Gang Sponsor!

Traditional Archery for Bowhunters






LEFT HAND BOWS CLASSIFIEDS TRAD GANG CLASSIFIEDS ACCESS RIGHT HAND BOWS CLASSIFIEDS


Author Topic: Static Recurve vs. Recurve  (Read 290 times)

Offline boinky

  • Trad Bowhunter
  • **
  • Posts: 35
Static Recurve vs. Recurve
« on: September 18, 2015, 11:27:00 AM »
If this is in the wrong forum I'm sorry.  I recently bought a static recurve and I'm still not sure what the difference is.......I understand what makes it static.....or at least I think I do.

Can somebody explain to me the difference in static and regular recurve?

Thanks!

Offline PEARL DRUMS

  • Trad Bowhunter
  • **
  • Posts: 3457
Re: Static Recurve vs. Recurve
« Reply #1 on: September 18, 2015, 11:29:00 AM »
A static tip recurve will not move or change shape as the bow is drawn. A standard recurve will uncoil some as the bow is drawn. Static means non-moving.

Offline boinky

  • Trad Bowhunter
  • **
  • Posts: 35
Re: Static Recurve vs. Recurve
« Reply #2 on: September 18, 2015, 11:31:00 AM »
Quote
Originally posted by PEARL DRUMS:
A static tip recurve will not move or change shape as the bow is drawn. A standard recurve will uncoil some as the bow is drawn. Static means non-moving.
Thanks......thats what I thought!  

So, what is the advantage of a static recurve?

Offline PEARL DRUMS

  • Trad Bowhunter
  • **
  • Posts: 3457
Re: Static Recurve vs. Recurve
« Reply #3 on: September 18, 2015, 11:37:00 AM »
IMO? Nothing. If you notice not many bowyers build statics, glass or wood. I think that is driven by demand more than difficulty in the build.

Online Pat B

  • TG HALL OF FAME
  • Trad Bowhunter
  • *****
  • Posts: 15005
Re: Static Recurve vs. Recurve
« Reply #4 on: September 18, 2015, 12:06:00 PM »
I think a static recurve is a bit faster because the static tips act as levers and put more strain on the working portions of the bow, giving a bit more power.
Make the most of all that comes and the least of all that goes!
TGMM Family of the Bow

Offline Michael Arnette

  • Trad Bowhunter
  • **
  • Posts: 2354
Re: Static Recurve vs. Recurve
« Reply #5 on: September 18, 2015, 12:08:00 PM »
I've shot a few statics, the are more quiet than most traditional Recurves and are slightly better than the average recurve for arrow speed.

Offline PEARL DRUMS

  • Trad Bowhunter
  • **
  • Posts: 3457
Re: Static Recurve vs. Recurve
« Reply #6 on: September 18, 2015, 12:22:00 PM »
Can't argue there may a bit of a performance difference, but I'll be darned if I can notice it at 15-20 yards. The draw can feel different to, not always a performance thing but a feel thing. Everybody has their own idea of how a bow should draw.

Offline fnshtr

  • Trad Bowhunter
  • **
  • Posts: 2631
Re: Static Recurve vs. Recurve
« Reply #7 on: September 18, 2015, 12:39:00 PM »
I'm a static "convert". The first static I shot, I shot better than any bow previously owned, and I've owned and shot several "top of the line" bows, both recurve and longbows.

It "feels" smoother, it is definitely quieter and just seems to "fit" me better than any bow I've owned. Also, there a LOT of bowyers offering statics.

I'm sure these observations are subjective... To each his own.

All I know is that I am convinced they are the right bow for me.JMO
56" Kempf Kwyk Styk 50@28
54" Java Man Elkheart 50@28
WVBA Member
1 John 3:1

Offline nineworlds9

  • Trad Bowhunter
  • **
  • Posts: 4605
  • Northman
Re: Static Recurve vs. Recurve
« Reply #8 on: September 18, 2015, 01:01:00 PM »
The only noticeable differences I have felt and observed are in sound tone/volume and draw feel.  The statics I have sampled have a more linear constant pull akin to a r/d longbow vs working curves which have that slight hump feeling as they uncurl.  Noise wise many seem to have a lower tone also as there is less string contact.  They are not automatically superior to any working curve IMHO.  Thats hype talking.  To me they are very very suited to the guy who can't decide between a hybrid LB and a working curve.  YMMV.
52" Texas Recurve
58" Two Tracks Ogemaw
60" Toelke Chinook
62" Tall Tines Stickflinger
64" Big Jim Mountain Monarch
64" Poison Dart LB
66" Wes Wallace Royal
            
Horse Creek TAC, GA
TBOF

Offline Paul Cousineau

  • Trad Bowhunter
  • **
  • Posts: 461
Re: Static Recurve vs. Recurve
« Reply #9 on: September 18, 2015, 01:26:00 PM »
I own both types and I have found that I can't make blanket statements about the differences in shooting characteristics. And if   I was to make such a statement it would be this: Generally speaking I find static tip recurves to be quitter than dynamic recurves. It seems that not everyone is on the same page when it comes to the technical attributes that deem a bow either static or dynamic…or even semi static. If you were to do a google search on the topic of static vs dynamic recurves you will find a lot info. There are a lot more bowyers making statics today than there was 3-4 years ago.
The lazy do not roast any game, but the diligent feast on the riches of the hunt. -Proverbs 12:27

Offline Kyle Lancaster

  • Trad Bowhunter
  • **
  • Posts: 372
Re: Static Recurve vs. Recurve
« Reply #10 on: September 18, 2015, 01:51:00 PM »
IMO, there are some bows out there claiming to be statics that are not. Some bows just have really aggressive "hooks" but they mostly unfold to a degree during the draw. Others like the Kwyk Styk are true statics. Again, my opinion.

Offline DaveT1963

  • Trad Bowhunter
  • **
  • Posts: 893
Re: Static Recurve vs. Recurve
« Reply #11 on: September 18, 2015, 03:33:00 PM »
For me - they are far more quiet and that is what I like about them.  The one I have from Abe P (Caribow) it just is the best shooting/pointing bow I have ever shot.  I really have to screw up the shot to miss much at 25 yards.  it just seems to be forgiving of my minor shooting form flaws.
Everything has a price - the more we accept, the more the cost

Caribow Tuktu ET 53# @ 27 Inches
Thunderhorn takedown longbow 55# @ 27
Lots of James Berry Bows

Offline Jmatt1957

  • Trad Bowhunter
  • **
  • Posts: 699
Re: Static Recurve vs. Recurve
« Reply #12 on: September 18, 2015, 05:13:00 PM »
I own both the standard recurve tends to be a bit noiser then the static tip bow. I also feel the static tip draws smoother and are faster. Everything else being the same.

Offline jackdaw

  • Trad Bowhunter
  • **
  • Posts: 1138
Re: Static Recurve vs. Recurve
« Reply #13 on: September 18, 2015, 07:01:00 PM »
This is a great thread! Have never read much about these..., but have been fascinated by them for a few years...!!! Interesting feedback...
John Getz:........... Time flies like an arrow, Fruit flies like bananas.
Ed HOLCOMB 59' KODIAK 51#
Ed HOLCOMB 59' KODIAK 47#
67'1/2  BEAR SUPER K  44#
WILSON BROTHERS BLACK WIDOW 60" 45#
LONGRIVER ELK 62" LONGBOW 53#
1967 WING 62" SLIMLINE 43#

Offline Cavscout9753

  • Trad Bowhunter
  • **
  • Posts: 997
Re: Static Recurve vs. Recurve
« Reply #14 on: September 18, 2015, 08:18:00 PM »
Yeah, great thread. I may never come off of ASLs, but I've always wondered about static tip recurves too. I guess I assumed they were somehow less performing bows and thats why they aren't as common. Good info and good to hear they're still out there.
ΙΧΘΥΣ

Users currently browsing this topic:

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
 

Contact Us | Trad Gang.com © | User Agreement

Copyright 2003 thru 2024 ~ Trad Gang.com ©