This has been a good thread for me personally...gave me time to think thru a few thoughts.
We all base our choices on experience(s).
I had one back years ago where I didn't see a tiny lead pencil size green briar that deflected an arrow shot at 22 yards at a broadside, quiet deer.
Hit behind the 11th rib onside and out behind the 4th off side..pass thru. But missed diaphragm and punched the liver.
I was at least 20 yrs younger...and at "ethical" range i failed to see a tiny twig that deflected an arrow from double lung to liver! Took that animal 2.5 hrs to die with the other state line only 125 yards away. Had I tried to get down, and it ran, I'd never got it.
I about gave up hunting watching that animal suffer and since, no matter how well I hit at what range, I won't shoot IN THE WOODS beyond 20... and that changes depending on lighting and other factors, always shorter, never longer.
I know guys who are crack shots at longer range... have great eyesight and take longer open shots. I don't get those, probably cause where I hunt in thicker stuff where deer move more.
That's Eastern hunting or so I found.
I applaud those with better accuracy then me and especially those with better eyesight. Deer move, foam doesn't. Stuff happens. Murphy has been a close cousin all my life.
enjoy the hunt... sticks aren't limited to lesser accuracy...I'd say stick hunters are, due to a variety of factors, but nothing is universal! Some excel.