3Rivers Archery



The Trad Gang Digital Market













Contribute to Trad Gang and Access the Classifieds!

Become a Trad Gang Sponsor!

Traditional Archery for Bowhunters






LEFT HAND BOWS CLASSIFIEDS TRAD GANG CLASSIFIEDS ACCESS RIGHT HAND BOWS CLASSIFIEDS


Author Topic: HH bug got me ... Part One!  (Read 138703 times)

Offline normf

  • Trad Bowhunter
  • **
  • Posts: 101
Re: HH bug got me ... Part One!
« Reply #10420 on: August 18, 2012, 01:49:00 PM »
I think I got the bug too. I'm thinking about a TD Redman. Do they shoot any differently than a regular handle? Does a TD have to be a straight grip? Thanks
NFetscher

Offline Looper

  • Trad Bowhunter
  • **
  • Posts: 1742
Re: HH bug got me ... Part One!
« Reply #10421 on: August 18, 2012, 01:51:00 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by normf:
I recently bought a used Redman 70in. 41# at my 30in. draw. Shooting 425 gr. arrow with a 2 blade broadhead. Is this enough bow for whitetail? It's so much fun to shoot I haven't picked up my ILF recurve since I bought it.  Thanks
Yep, you'll be fine. A long draw adds a lot of speed. Personally, if I were to hunt with that bow, I'd bump the arrow weight up some. Maybe as high as 550 grains. At your draw, you'll be shooting the equivalent of a 47@28 bow drawn to 28.

Offline WESTBROOK

  • TG HALL OF FAME
  • Trad Bowhunter
  • *****
  • Posts: 3385
Re: HH bug got me ... Part One!
« Reply #10422 on: August 18, 2012, 04:16:00 PM »
Quote
Yep, you'll be fine. A long draw adds a lot of speed. Personally, if I were to hunt with that bow, I'd bump the arrow weight up some. Maybe as high as 550 grains. At your draw, you'll be shooting the equivalent of a 47@28 bow drawn to 28.
Absolutely!

  • Guest
Re: HH bug got me ... Part One!
« Reply #10423 on: August 18, 2012, 05:30:00 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by normf:
I recently bought a used Redman 70in. 41# at my 30in. draw. Shooting 425 gr. arrow with a 2 blade broadhead. Is this enough bow for whitetail? It's so much fun to shoot I haven't picked up my ILF recurve since I bought it.  Thanks
Whitetails are not that difficult to kill providing you place that arrow in the right spot.  I also agree that, all things being equal, you will have no problem with that set-up.

A heavier arrow will give better penetration but you will limit your effective range some....seems it could be a significant trade-off at a light draw weight....just guessing here.

 I learned a few things here on this thread over the past year:

Two things come to mind; the first is that, as I understand it, the 70"er, having longer limbs will not as efficiently energize that arrow as a 68 or a 66.

The second thing is one that I had to come to grips a year ago and that is maintaining that 30" draw.  If you are rather new to shooting hills and (like I was) began with what I "knew" was my draw length, you (as I did) may find your actual draw is significantly less than what you thought.  I started with 30.5" and now truly draw a tad under 27" consistently...while shooting.

That's over 3" and that or any portion thereof could decrease your draw wt. as much as 2.5# per inch.  For me it killed about 7# of push that my arrow needed for efficient efficiency.

I am not an expert by any means but there are a few guys that haunt this place who can clarify.

Here is an option if you can or want to shoot a heavier weight....Craig at HHA can shorten and refinish your bow for around $100 plus shipping.  He told me that I could expect a minimum increase in draw weight of 6#.

Offline Mudd

  • TGMM Member
  • Trad Bowhunter
  • ***
  • Posts: 12391
Re: HH bug got me ... Part One!
« Reply #10424 on: August 19, 2012, 09:03:00 AM »
longbowben .... Hey buddy!  

I was just wondering what your thoughts are looking back?....I mean just look at what you started a life in...lol

It's pretty darned amazing if anyone were to ask me.

God bless,Mudd
Trying to make a difference
Psalm 37:4
Roy L "Mudd" Williams
TGMM- Family Of The Bow
Archery isn't something I do, it's who I am!
The road to "Sherwood" makes for an awesome journey.

Offline Overspined

  • TG HALL OF FAME
  • Trad Bowhunter
  • *****
  • Posts: 3049
Re: HH bug got me ... Part One!
« Reply #10425 on: August 19, 2012, 11:10:00 AM »
Quote
Originally posted by Macatawa:
 
Quote
Originally posted by normf:
I recently bought a used Redman 70in. 41# at my 30in. draw. Shooting 425 gr. arrow with a 2 blade broadhead. Is this enough bow for whitetail? It's so much fun to shoot I haven't picked up my ILF recurve since I bought it.  Thanks
Whitetails are not that difficult to kill providing you place that arrow in the right spot.  I also agree that, all things being equal, you will have no problem with that set-up.

A heavier arrow will give better penetration but you will limit your effective range some....seems it could be a significant trade-off at a light draw weight....just guessing here.

 I learned a few things here on this thread over the past year:

Two things come to mind; the first is that, as I understand it, the 70"er, having longer limbs will not as efficiently energize that arrow as a 68 or a 66.

The second thing is one that I had to come to grips a year ago and that is maintaining that 30" draw.  If you are rather new to shooting hills and (like I was) began with what I "knew" was my draw length, you (as I did) may find your actual draw is significantly less than what you thought.  I started with 30.5" and now truly draw a tad under 27" consistently...while shooting.

That's over 3" and that or any portion thereof could decrease your draw wt. as much as 2.5# per inch.  For me it killed about 7# of push that my arrow needed for efficient efficiency.

I am not an expert by any means but there are a few guys that haunt this place who can clarify.

Here is an option if you can or want to shoot a heavier weight....Craig at HHA can shorten and refinish your bow for around $100 plus shipping.  He told me that I could expect a minimum increase in draw weight of 6#. [/b]
For 30" draw, 70" is a solid length, you'll be happy.  The shorter bows won't add anything but finger pinch and stack at that draw length IMO.  Run them through a chrono and you'll notice...probably almost nothing . Arrow weight over 500gr is always a good idea for hunting.

Hill T/D are always the sleeve system. 2 sizes.  I did a mod on one of mine, I posted it a page or two back.

There are other bowyers that make a T/D Hill style with other systems like the connection hinge, or bow bolt, etc.

Offline MikeM

  • Trad Bowhunter
  • **
  • Posts: 296
Re: HH bug got me ... Part One!
« Reply #10426 on: August 19, 2012, 01:24:00 PM »
I have a 29" draw on Hill bows and have found the 70" length from Craig at HHA more to my liking than the 66" or the 68" having shot all three lengths.

Offline MikeNova

  • Trad Bowhunter
  • **
  • Posts: 859
Re: HH bug got me ... Part One!
« Reply #10427 on: August 19, 2012, 01:39:00 PM »
Well screwed up amd made an stupid mistake opening day I thought it was getting about time to get down and I scanned real carefull making sure no deer were around about 30 secs latter as I'm lowering the bow to the ground the deer to my left let out an alarm scream and took off. I feel sure they were does and it wasnt doe day but where I screwed up was as i looked around it wasnt dark enough to get down had that been a buck I would have wasted an oppertunity.

Offline tg2nd

  • Trad Bowhunter
  • **
  • Posts: 431
Re: HH bug got me ... Part One!
« Reply #10428 on: August 19, 2012, 02:21:00 PM »
Does anybody know what happened to Ron DiStefanos try to make a Takedown Hill with a Robertson Connexion Hinge?
German by birth, Bavarian by the grace of god

  • Guest
Re: HH bug got me ... Part One!
« Reply #10429 on: August 19, 2012, 03:13:00 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by tg2nd:
Does anybody know what happened to Ron DiStefanos try to make a Takedown Hill with a Robertson Connexion Hinge?
I believe he nixed the project.

  • Guest
Re: HH bug got me ... Part One!
« Reply #10430 on: August 19, 2012, 03:24:00 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by Overspined:
 
Quote
Originally posted by Macatawa:



The second thing is one that I had to come to grips a year ago and that is maintaining that 30" draw.  If you are rather new to shooting hills and (like I was) began with what I "knew" was my draw length, you (as I did) may find your actual draw is significantly less than what you thought.  I started with 30.5" and now truly draw a tad under 27" consistently...while shooting.

That's over 3" and that or any portion thereof could decrease your draw wt. as much as 2.5# per inch.  For me it killed about 7# of push that my arrow needed for efficient efficiency.
 
 
For 30" draw, 70" is a solid length, you'll be happy.  
[/b]
Matt, I agree that a true and solid 30" draw would be great for a 70" longbow.  I guess I took too long to say "if your draw is not a true 30", you may be disappointed in performance.  Thinking I had a 31" draw, I ordered a 69" Half Breed from Craig.  When I found out, after settling into a good form that my draw was 27", I realized that I made a mistake.

I agree that, at 30" a short(er) bow will do nothing but add stack.  Just trying to help others' avoid my mistake.

Offline Owlmagnet

  • Trad Bowhunter
  • **
  • Posts: 336
Re: HH bug got me ... Part One!
« Reply #10431 on: August 19, 2012, 03:26:00 PM »
I have been fooling around with brace height on my new Tembo and it occurred to me that measuring the brace height from the grip to the string, the long recommended procedure, fails to take in account the depth of the grip.

I have three 66" Hills, all of which have straight grips of different depths--from 1-7/8" to 2-3/8". (I continuously experiment in my search for a repeatable straight grip.) With that degree of variation, the recommended 6-1/4" brace height for a 66" Hill becomes essentially meaningless.

I have started measuring brace height from the back of the bow to the string, instead, and believe that 8" seems to be a pretty effective starting point for my 66" Hills. I am also wondering if "lower is better", in general, for Hill-style bow brace height, (at least, for me), particularly as risers become shorter. Any thoughts?

Offline khardrunner

  • Trad Bowhunter
  • **
  • Posts: 1729
Re: HH bug got me ... Part One!
« Reply #10432 on: August 19, 2012, 03:32:00 PM »
I go low for sure. Usually around 5 3/4 -6 1/4.
I Corinthians 9 24-25
...run in such a way so as to obtain the prize!

  • Guest
Re: HH bug got me ... Part One!
« Reply #10433 on: August 19, 2012, 04:22:00 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by Owlmagnet:


I have three 66" Hills, all of which have straight grips of different depths--from 1-7/8" to 2-3/8". (I continuously experiment in my search for a repeatable straight grip.) With that degree of variation, the recommended 6-1/4" brace height for a 66" Hill becomes essentially meaningless.

I have started measuring brace height from the back of the bow to the string, instead, and believe that 8" seems to be a pretty effective starting point for my 66" Hills. I am also wondering if "lower is better", in general, for Hill-style bow brace height, (at least, for me), particularly as risers become shorter. Any thoughts?
Good point!   That is a lot of "noise" and I agree that it could be meaningless.  I also agree with "go lower" but that revelation took me many months to grasp.

Do you measure at the fadeout to the string now?

Offline Owlmagnet

  • Trad Bowhunter
  • **
  • Posts: 336
Re: HH bug got me ... Part One!
« Reply #10434 on: August 19, 2012, 05:25:00 PM »
No sir, I measure brace height from the back of the bow at the arrow shelf, to the string.

Offline Owlmagnet

  • Trad Bowhunter
  • **
  • Posts: 336
Re: HH bug got me ... Part One!
« Reply #10435 on: August 19, 2012, 07:03:00 PM »
By the way, if there is a "literacy test" for Trad Gang membership that hinges upon the ability to post photographs, y'all might as well kick me off, now. It looks like "Owlmagnet's Photo Album on Photobucket" is as close as I'm gonna get to posting photos of the new Tembo I received from Craig on Thursday....

Sorry. (I HATE being stupid.)

  • Guest
Re: HH bug got me ... Part One!
« Reply #10436 on: August 19, 2012, 07:04:00 PM »
Bob...yep...got it.  
That works. I missed your very clear explanation - sorry.

Offline khardrunner

  • Trad Bowhunter
  • **
  • Posts: 1729
Re: HH bug got me ... Part One!
« Reply #10437 on: August 19, 2012, 07:28:00 PM »
email the pics to me and I will post them :-)
I Corinthians 9 24-25
...run in such a way so as to obtain the prize!

Offline Owlmagnet

  • Trad Bowhunter
  • **
  • Posts: 336
Re: HH bug got me ... Part One!
« Reply #10438 on: August 19, 2012, 07:50:00 PM »
khardrunner: PM sent!

Offline SportHunter

  • Trad Bowhunter
  • **
  • Posts: 1684
Re: HH bug got me ... Part One!
« Reply #10439 on: August 19, 2012, 10:11:00 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by tg2nd:
Does anybody know what happened to Ron DiStefanos try to make a Takedown Hill with a Robertson Connexion Hinge?
Not sure about Rob's build but I bought a northern mist classic with the connexion hinge this year and it works out very nice. Steve said he found it to be the most stable and reliable of all the systems he's tried.  I'll try to take some pics.

I'm sure it has a lot to do with the bowyers skill as well with how well any TD system turns out.

Users currently browsing this topic:

0 Members and 22 Guests are viewing this topic.
 

Contact Us | Trad Gang.com © | User Agreement

Copyright 2003 thru 2024 ~ Trad Gang.com ©