Handle: Hill 2 1/16" C&N 2 1/14 at base, 1 15/16 under shelve, (consistent slope)
Limb width: Hill/riser fade 1 1/16" C&N 1 1/8", limb tips both are 1/2", Both are 1/2" deep cores at the riser fades, both are roughly 3/8" at the tips.
Handle length: HIll 4 1/2" C&N 5 1/4"
riser length: Hill 15" C&N 12 1/2".
Both shoot wonderful. The 1/16' difference in limb width is very noticeable to the naked eye though. The C&N seems more "beefy" and the Hill more narrow and refined. I will say this though, but neither of them have no perceived handshock whatsoever. The Hill is a little twangier (if that makes sense), where as the C&N has a solid thud. I will say the hill seems faster to point as opposed to the C&N, but not by much. The C&N weighs a touch more, (probably a few ounces at most) It will be hard to choose one over the other, but I will say that I am a huge fan of the feel from the American Semi-Longbow. I do enjoy my mile D/R "D" bows but on the shot you can tell the difference between them and I prefer the "HIll Style" bows.
The C&N has red elm cores, which this is my second Red Elm cored bow and I really do like the feel of them.