When I was tillering my own Hill style bows, I found that when the lower limb from gravitational center to the string groove was 1&1/4" shorter with a 1/8" less measurement from bow to string at the end of the fadeout, and if when I traced the limbs of a strung bow on absolute repeatable locater pins and I got a perfect tapered gull wing from 1/8" to zero with the gull wing trace lines not crossing spreading or doing anything irregular, the bow shot perfect with the nocking point positioned 1/8" up from level, nocking under the arrow. When they start adding a lot of extra curves and swerves to the limb shapes that may be something other than symmetric other the the bias of the lower limb being shorter, saying anything definite would be out of my league. I have seen bows that required odd nocking point placements and found those bows to be very testy. My wife had a Darton the the measurements made no sense. It wanted the nocking point to be very high, then the bow was still very sensitive. I did not try to adjust the bow, I put an elevated arrow rest in the position that was a bit under the level of the best nocking point position without the rest and bingo, the bow felt better, it was no longer sensitive and my wife killed a deer with that bow five years in a row without a miss.