3Rivers Archery



The Trad Gang Digital Market













Contribute to Trad Gang and Access the Classifieds!

Become a Trad Gang Sponsor!

Traditional Archery for Bowhunters






LEFT HAND BOWS CLASSIFIEDS TRAD GANG CLASSIFIEDS ACCESS RIGHT HAND BOWS CLASSIFIEDS


Author Topic: Short vs long recurves  (Read 3091 times)

Online Ryan Rothhaar

  • TG HALL OF FAME
  • Trad Bowhunter
  • *****
  • Posts: 1315
Re: Short vs long recurves
« Reply #20 on: January 25, 2017, 05:42:00 AM »
For recurves I shot 64 inch for years, the last decade or so I'm hunting with 66 inch bows.  For a hybrid type longbow I like 68.  I'm 5'6" and draw 29.5.  I've never had an issue in a tree stand (that's why they invented pruning saws), or spot and stalk type hunting, a couple times I have had problems with home made ground blinds at friend's places.... so I'm careful when hunting from someone else's ground blind to check clearance.

I think the whole "short bow for hunting" thing is something that guys hear so much they just start repeating it.  In over 30 years of serious hunting with recurves and long bows I've never worried about, or had real issues with, longer bows, and have enjoyed the benefits. Dad is approaching 60yrs behind recurve bows and I cannot remember ever seeing him shoot one under 64 inches, also never heard a story from him about losing out on an animal due to a longer bow.

R

Offline 59Alaskan

  • TGMM Member
  • Trad Bowhunter
  • ***
  • Posts: 2336
Re: Short vs long recurves
« Reply #21 on: January 25, 2017, 05:53:00 AM »
I shoot 56-64".  I prefer 62-64".  64" recurves can just be super sweet and smooth.  At one time I had a 66" recurve and I really liked that also.  I took it hunting a few times, tree stand and ground.  Never had an opportunity at game though
TGMM Family of the Bow

"God has given us two hands, one to receive with and the other to give with.” - Billy Graham

Offline Tom

  • Trad Bowhunter
  • **
  • Posts: 2269
Re: Short vs long recurves
« Reply #22 on: January 25, 2017, 06:02:00 AM »
62-64" recurves with a 29.5" draw. Short guy with monkey arms.
The essence of the hunt for me is to enter nature and observe+ return safely occasionally with the gift of a life taken.

Offline Stykbowslim

  • Trad Bowhunter
  • **
  • Posts: 175
Re: Short vs long recurves
« Reply #23 on: January 25, 2017, 06:24:00 AM »
I've been shooting recurves for 47 years. Mostly 62" to 66" bows. Since the mid-eighties, I've stuck with the 62" recurves. I'm 5'8" and I draw 29.5, and I've never had a problem with bow length in my hunting setups, whether out of a tree stand, ground blind, or spot and stalk hunting.

A few years ago, I did have some bow clearance issues when my son invited me to hunt his treestand setups. At 5'6" and shooting a compound, my son didn't think about the bow clearance issues that "dear old dad" would have. However, some handy work with a pruner and a pruning saw solved those issues.
"Keep your nose in the wind and your eye along the skyline."

Online Crooked Stic

  • TG HALL OF FAME
  • Trad Bowhunter
  • *****
  • Posts: 6243
Re: Short vs long recurves
« Reply #24 on: January 25, 2017, 07:39:00 AM »
Of course your draw length will determine how short you could go and be comfortable. I feel the longer bows will be more forgiving. Although A well designned short bow can work also.
High on Archery.

Offline stagetek

  • Tradbowhunter
  • Trad Bowhunter
  • *
  • Posts: 1764
Re: Short vs long recurves
« Reply #25 on: January 25, 2017, 09:21:00 PM »
60-64" for me. Prefer the 64"ers. I shoot better with a longer bow.

Online katman

  • TG HALL OF FAME
  • Trad Bowhunter
  • *****
  • Posts: 3578
Re: Short vs long recurves
« Reply #26 on: January 25, 2017, 09:31:00 PM »
62 for a blind or 64 for me is sweet on my DAS risers, 29.5" draw.

That 21" DAS metal riser, heck of a riser, is not only adding length but mass so I feel that helps accuracy. Good choice on medium limbs for your draw.
shoot straight shoot often

Offline D. Key

  • Trad Bowhunter
  • **
  • Posts: 1185
Re: Short vs long recurves
« Reply #27 on: January 27, 2017, 10:13:00 AM »
For me with a 27" draw length, I used to shoot 58" almost exclusively with an occasional 60". A couple of years ago I ordered a 56" Chinook from Dan Toelke and it is by far the best shooting recurve I have ever had.  Great for pop-up blinds and tree stand hunting.
"Pick-A-Spot"

Doug Key

Offline indianalongbowshooter

  • Trad Bowhunter
  • **
  • Posts: 831
Re: Short vs long recurves
« Reply #28 on: January 27, 2017, 10:21:00 AM »
It all depends on the bow Ive had a 52 in. Fedora 3 pc. Gaboon Ebony riser w/all bamboo limbs recurve that felt/shot like a 62 in. bow, same for a few other short bows it all depends on bow design.. some short bows feel like they are going to break at full draw and are a lot harder to be accurate with..
I prefer a 56 in. bow to hunt with and for general shooting such as 3-D a 62 in. recurve or longbow..
dean/indianalongbowshooter

Offline Buckeye1977

  • Contributing Member
  • Trad Bowhunter
  • ****
  • Posts: 796
Re: Short vs long recurves
« Reply #29 on: January 27, 2017, 11:23:00 AM »
I like the shorter bows myself cause the spots I usually hunt are very thick and tight or are in ground blinds but I only draw about 26.5".
Nick

Zipper standard 60” 55@28
Zipper standard 62” 52@28

Offline BlacktailBowhunter

  • Trad Bowhunter
  • **
  • Posts: 884
Re: Short vs long recurves
« Reply #30 on: January 28, 2017, 12:13:00 AM »
I shot Norm Johnson's 62" Sitka and asked him if the 58" or 56" would shoot as smooth and he said I wouldn't notice any difference, so I'm excited to get it. I draw about 26.5" and contemplated the 56" but I can't get past thinking that I'll be more accurate with the 58". Bowwild or Roy has a 56" and 58" Sitka and says he doesn't notice a difference.

I guess a lot has to do with bow design and whether you're hunting or target shooting.
Join a credible hunting organization, participate in it, and take a kid hunting. Member: U.S. Sportsmen's Alliance, NWTF, Oregon Hunter's Assn., Oregon Bow Hunters and  Oregon Foundation for Blacktailed Deer.

Offline YORNOC

  • Trad Bowhunter
  • **
  • Posts: 2993
Re: Short vs long recurves
« Reply #31 on: January 28, 2017, 07:21:00 AM »
I had to beg and plead for years to get Dave Windauer to build me a 66" Silvertip recurve.
He finally caved, love it.
David M. Conroy

Offline cacciatore

  • Contributing Member
  • Trad Bowhunter
  • ****
  • Posts: 8337
Re: Short vs long recurves
« Reply #32 on: January 28, 2017, 08:08:00 AM »
I don't have problems using short bows that at my hunting distances I find better weapons.
1993 PBS Regular
Compton
CBA
CSTAS

Offline tomsm44

  • Trad Bowhunter
  • **
  • Posts: 1340
Re: Short vs long recurves
« Reply #33 on: January 28, 2017, 08:18:00 AM »
The few I typically hunt with range from 56-60".  One thing that I think is overlooked is mass weight.  A longer bow will also typically weigh a little more, which also goes a long way to aid accuracy.  

Part way into this season, I swapped from a 56" 42# Hoots Custom recurve to a 60" 55# 1966 Kodiak.  The reason was that I was more accurate with the Kodiak than the Hoots, despite a 13# increase in draw weight.  

But I honestly think the mass weight was more of a factor than the length.  The Hoots is extremely light and seems to move all over the place when drawn.  I have 58" bows with more mass weight that I shoot just as well as the Kodiak. I bet attaching a quiver to the Hoots would help out a lot.
Matt Toms

Flatwoods Custom R/D:  64", 47@28
'66 Kodiak: 60", 55@28
Redwing Hunter:  58", 53@28
Ben Pearson 709 Hunter:  58", 47@28
Ben Pearson 709 Hunter:  58", 42@28
Hoots Recurve:  56", 42@28

Offline cacciatore

  • Contributing Member
  • Trad Bowhunter
  • ****
  • Posts: 8337
Re: Short vs long recurves
« Reply #34 on: January 28, 2017, 08:44:00 AM »
Don't forget the riser lenght factor. A 64" 19" riser bow has the same string angle as a 60" 15" riser bow.
1993 PBS Regular
Compton
CBA
CSTAS

Offline mangonboat

  • Trad Bowhunter
  • **
  • Posts: 1023
Re: Short vs long recurves
« Reply #35 on: January 28, 2017, 10:05:00 AM »
52"-66". Mass distribution makes a big difference. The easiest bow I've come across to shoot accurately was a 64" Frankenbow made from a 70's Bear compound riser and Sage limbs, where the mass was concentrated at the top and bottom of the riser, at the limb bases, rather than mid-riser, a design that gained popularity in the mid-60's recurves and still popular today.
mangonboat

I've adopted too many bows that needed a good home.

Offline Friend

  • TG HALL OF FAME
  • Trad Bowhunter
  • *****
  • Posts: 8164
Re: Short vs long recurves
« Reply #36 on: January 30, 2017, 01:33:00 PM »
Fond of 62"s at my 28" draw.

Since my hunting is from the ground only, a 56"r fits all of my setups. Am not capable of shooting competently with many shorter bows.

When you hold out 100+ hunts and finally gifted that special opportunity, one may be more focused on elevated confidence in placing the arrow on the mark.
>>----> Friend <----<<

My Lands… Are Where My Dead Lie Buried.......Crazy Horse

Offline YosemiteSam

  • Trad Bowhunter
  • **
  • Posts: 1092
Re: Short vs long recurves
« Reply #37 on: January 30, 2017, 02:02:00 PM »
62".  Tried a 58" but it took more concentration to hit my mark effectively.  May have just been a weight issue since my 62" bows are heavy take-down.

I've been itching to try something super short with a thumb ring, however.  Seems like it may be a little better for maneuvering in the bush.  Only one way to find out, I suppose...
"A good hunter...that's somebody the animals COME to."
"Every animal knows way more than you do." -- by a Koyukon hunter, as quoted by R. Nelson.

Online stevem

  • Contributing Member
  • Trad Bowhunter
  • ****
  • Posts: 527
Re: Short vs long recurves
« Reply #38 on: January 30, 2017, 02:06:00 PM »
62" and a 27" draw
"What was big was not the fish, but the chance.  What was full was not the creel, but the memory" - Aldo Leopold   "Good judgement comes from experience, and a lot of that comes from bad judgement"- Will Rogers

Online Terry Green

  • Administrator
  • Trad Bowhunter
  • ****
  • Posts: 29217
Re: Short vs long recurves
« Reply #39 on: February 01, 2017, 04:57:00 PM »
It could be the bow....not the length ...some bows just fit guys styles better...and 2 inches either way really shouldn't matter.

I like 60 inch recurves and longbows...shoot them good as anything else I've owned that's longer...60 just fits me.
Tradbowhunting Video Store - https://digitalstore.tradgang.com/

Tradgang Bowhunting Merchandise - https://tradgang.creator-spring.com/?

Tradgang DVD - https://www.tradgang.com/tgstore/index.html

"It's important,  when going after a goal, to never lose sight of the integrity of the journey" - Andy Garcia

'An anchor point is not a destination, its  an evolution to conclusion'

Users currently browsing this topic:

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
 

Contact Us | Trad Gang.com © | User Agreement

Copyright 2003 thru 2024 ~ Trad Gang.com ©