Abe,I'm not sure my hearing is good enough to discern if they are quieter but they seem quiet to me.I should add,I acquired a 56" Caribow Wolverine and really like it.I could go higher on the FOC if I were willing to give up the wrap,which I really like and I'm positive I could go to a 2 1/2" AA fletch,without a hitch.
sticksnstones,they are Onestringer wraps that I cut to 4".I do burn the fletch.The gray band is 1/4" Easton Platinum footing.
I've started delving in this,in 2008 and have have built several dozen sets of arrows,most having more FOC than the one before.Once I got in the mid 20's,I started seeing a difference in stability,penetration and wind deflection.With each jump in FOC,these aspects were more apparent.This current set of arrows is the best of all.
Ashby has pointed out many times that this does also apply to bad hits on North American big game.A bad hit on a whitetail can involve 1/2" thick bone,similar in thickness to a water buffalo rib.I don't want to make bad hits and FOC etc is not a substitute for practicing and good shot placement,but an arrow setup that drastically increases penetration,without pulling an extra pound of bow weight,is a boon for me.
At 67,I'm not going to be able to increase bow weight any more.My current 50# setups,now penetrate better than my former 60# plus bows did with normal FOC,9-10 GPP arrows.They are also more stable in high winds which are always an issue,here in MT,especially in the open country where antelope,mule deer and whitetails are hunted.
I have tree stands where an elk,big black bear,moose or other big game may show up as likely as deer and I'd never hesitate to shoot at the largest of them,with my current arrows out of 50-53# bows and expect two holes but am trying for pass throughs on all shots.I believe,as Fred Bear did,that pass throughs can drastically shorten retrieval distances.