Originally posted by Captain*Kirk:
Sure, carbon and aluminum both have superior qualities over wood. So do magnesium risers and carbon fiber limbs. Not knocking them nor those who choose to take advantage of those qualities, it's just not my cup of tea. I used to hunt with compounds once upon a time...I went trad to relax and smell the forest around me. Woodies and vintage bows just seem to fit.
I agree with you friend.
Carbons might perform slightly better and magnesium risers filled with lead might be more "forgiving" along with clickers, stabilizers, and other add on's but if someone is going to got that far why not just go all the way and shoot a compound?
I know one thing and that's that Howard Hill was a hell of a shot and he used wooden arrows they have to be pretty damn good.....
I'm of the opinion that the more natural materials you use in terms of shooting archery the more rewarding it comes because it becomes more difficult as well since you are starting to do it the way they did it for 2000+ odd years.
As an example anyone can shoot well with a modern Olympic recurve but hand them a one piece longbow or recurve and things are going to get really challenging for them without all of those crutches they are used to.