Richard,
I probably should NOT have even brought it up, so let me clarify. In my time living in MT, then VA they had what they called "site specific management." That meant from one ridge to another ---seasons, species and bag limits changed. Very taxing, but I admired it.
I mentioned this to Gary and, best memory serves me that many years ago, he mumbled something about "having merit... but you have to work with the system available" Whatever his comment was specifically, let me take responsiblity for "thinking" that he'd have preferred much smaller management units in agreement with models I'd shared like above.
Obviously, while he was the one in charge of the overall concept for deer management, I think it unlikely he had carte blance to set all the rules for all aspects. I heard other of the "Commissioners" voice their opinion that we needed fewer, not more, management units. Bam. We got some honking big 'uns now.
If PA would just implement a bit more conservative policies on public lands, like VA, I "wonder" if it might help. No crystal ball in my poke, but it's a curiosity. Where they get hammered, back off some...where it's private, whack and stack if need be.
Just too complex for my head...makes my brain sweat!