The Byron interview was excellent and like you, there were some different questions I would have liked in there. Hind sight is excellent stuff. When conversing about the Hill aim versus 'become the arrow'. I think many are looking for a mechanical switch to throw. Hill's explanation is very mechanical, but in short order with consistent technique and practice, I would bet will fall into the 'become the arrow' system for many. One question I would have liked is the center is the center aspect. How forced is that mentally? When I mentally force an aim, it becomes an argument. I need to feel more casual about it, exacting, but casual.
I think the general history picture of what makes the man was excellent. I was not aware of the eye speed info, makes perfect sense.