Shooters Forum

Contribute to Trad Gang
Become a Trad Gang Sponsor


« previous next »
Pages: [1]   Go Down

Author Topic: History channel.....  (Read 1661 times)

Offline JBiorn

  • Trad Bowhunter
  • **
  • Posts: 978
History channel.....
« on: February 28, 2007, 01:40:00 AM »
I am watching this really good show right now. They are explaining the ancient Egyptians' weaponry.

 Now, these guys are talking about ancient composite bows shooting like 300fps!! Are they just screwy, or is this reality?

 If this is the case, I have just GOT to have one of these bows!


 Jeff
Logged

Offline John57

  • Trad Bowhunter
  • **
  • Posts: 77
Re: History channel.....
« Reply #1 on: February 28, 2007, 03:27:00 AM »
They make it up as they go along.
Remember how the experts are always going on about the average English longbow being 100-180lb,,,,,yeah great,,the bows found on the Mary rose all measured 90lb or less,,,,all of them,,,LOL.
Logged

Offline OconeeDan

  • Trad Bowhunter
  • **
  • Posts: 1685
Re: History channel.....
« Reply #2 on: February 28, 2007, 07:42:00 AM »
Those guys didn't seem to be the experts they pretended to be.  The 300fps was a wee bit on the fast side.  Note that they were explaining paradox, and they said they call it "fish tailing".  Well, most archers call it paradox.  
I guess it looked good to the masses that don't know better.
Dan
Logged

Offline JBiorn

  • Trad Bowhunter
  • **
  • Posts: 978
Re: History channel.....
« Reply #3 on: February 28, 2007, 09:12:00 AM »
I was laughing a bit about the paradox thing, too.

 Jeff
Logged

Offline Patience

  • Trad Bowhunter
  • **
  • Posts: 139
Re: History channel.....
« Reply #4 on: February 28, 2007, 03:20:00 PM »
I don't know about 300 fps, but (i could be mistaken about the group) the huns launched arrows from their small horse bows, distances that are still not equalled.
Logged

Offline Van/TX

  • Trad Bowhunter
  • **
  • Posts: 1216
Re: History channel.....
« Reply #5 on: February 28, 2007, 03:40:00 PM »
Wouldn't the turkish flight bows shoot at least that fast?  Probably faster?...Van
Logged
Retired USAF (1966 - 1989)
Retired DoD Civilian (1989 - 2009)
And drawing Social Security!
I love this country ;-)

Offline Jake H

  • Trad Bowhunter
  • **
  • Posts: 63
Re: History channel.....
« Reply #6 on: February 28, 2007, 06:58:00 PM »
John57,

I'd be curious to know where you're getting your information from.

If you read Hardy or Soar or Strickland or, particularly, Kooi, you'll find substantially higher numbers than '90lbs or less'.   Since they're working with data from the actual recovered staves (to say nothing of the actual staves), I think they're in a position to comment.

Bows made by Roy King, official bowyer to the Mary Rose Trust, based on the the dimensions of the recovered bows, came in at 102.5 to 135lbs. (per Strickland)

If you're going to accuse people of making it up as they go along, at LEAST cite your sources.

Jake
(who wonders why people have so much trouble with the concept of heavy warbows)
Logged

Offline tim-flood

  • Trad Bowhunter
  • **
  • Posts: 327
Re: History channel.....
« Reply #7 on: March 02, 2007, 09:56:00 AM »
did you see how big that piece on sinew was it must have been from an ox!!  then he says that you wrap it around the bow!!
Pretty cool looking bows any way
Logged
Pages: [1]   Go Up
« previous next »

Users currently browsing this topic:

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
 

Contact Us | Trad Gang.com © | User Agreement

Copyright 2003 thru 2024 ~ Trad Gang.com ©