Well, here are my 2 cents ...
I was once told that the journey is more important than the destination.
Why is it that instinctive shooting has to justify itself again and again? Because somebody can shoot more accurately with "point of aim" or with a compound bow, or a crossbow or with a rifle?
You can substitute "point of aim" with compound bow, or cross bow and I guess it would be the same argument ... these devices or aiming methods allow you to shoot more accurately with less training.
I can pick up my crossbow and can shoot pretty accurate. Take it once to the range to make sure the sights are still good before hunting season opens ... and that's it for practice and training. But then… for me, this is not what I call fun ... and that’s why my crossbow sits in the closet and collects dust.
I think most of you will agree that it takes definitely more time and practice in order to shoot a traditional bow well. How many years have you guys been practicing/shooting?
Now, I would presume that it also takes more practice to shoot a longbow well instinctively than shooting it with "point of aim". But, I guess we can argue this ...
What I know … I have never won a tournament and to be honest I do not care much about winning. But I have a lot of fun shooting my longbow and shooting instinctively, and I am out at the range every week. And yes, I might still be standing in this barn that I cannot hit. But I hope this does not make me a disgrace to traditional archery as it was mentioned earlier.
I would suggest a bit more respect for those that have chosen the hard way … and for who most of the journey still lies ahead.