Shooters Forum

Contribute to Trad Gang
Become a Trad Gang Sponsor



Author Topic: SPLIT VS. 3 UNDER  (Read 2514 times)

Offline arkiewoodsman

  • Trad Bowhunter
  • **
  • Posts: 37
SPLIT VS. 3 UNDER
« on: November 02, 2007, 12:31:00 PM »
ive been shooting a longbow for a few months and the first advice i got was to shoot three under. i am fairly accurate that way at 20 yards or so but i see all the greats shooting split fingered. as dumb as this sounds i want to shoot split even though id have to relearn and im not as accurate. im also having a hard time finding a good anchor point since with 3 under i touch the fletching to the tip of my nose. what now? thoughts?
mmaman    :banghead:
be the kind of man your dog thinks you are. arkiewoodsman

Black Widow Longbow
45# @ 28

Offline Rick D

  • Trad Bowhunter
  • **
  • Posts: 23
Re: SPLIT VS. 3 UNDER
« Reply #1 on: November 02, 2007, 08:50:00 PM »
i know exactly what you are thinking, i went thru that too when my father saw that i shot 3 under ( he shoots split). i didn't even know that i was doing it really, it just felt better, which leads me to my point. Do what works for you!!! i finally made the decision to shoot MY WAY! thats what all the greats did, they shot their way. Whether you're talking about Gap vs Instinctive or 3under vs Split. Maybe thats what made them legends, they forged their own trails. thats just the conclusion i have come too.

Rick
Its all Gary Paulsen's fault, he got me dreaming about a bent stick and string.

Striker Slapstik LB 56", 54lbs@28"

Offline Scott J. Williams

  • Trad Bowhunter
  • **
  • Posts: 342
Re: SPLIT VS. 3 UNDER
« Reply #2 on: November 05, 2007, 10:01:00 AM »
While I shoot split finger, I agree with Rick. I would say that a lot of the current "Greats" shoot three fingers under.   Having said that, here are few things that might make your transition a little smoother.

Use the middle finger at the corner of your mouth, instead of the index finger.  The third finger will touch a spot on the side of your chin, that will be your draw check.  To tell you the truth, when I started the middle finger in the corner of the mouth, I never really worried about a second anchor check.  It just seemed so natural.
Black Widow SAV Recurve 60inch "Ironwood" 62@28
Black Widow PLX longbow 62inch "Osage" 52@26

Offline Faith In Flight

  • Trad Bowhunter
  • **
  • Posts: 55
Re: SPLIT VS. 3 UNDER
« Reply #3 on: November 12, 2007, 03:19:00 AM »
I started shooting 3 under because I found I was more accurate that way, I believe it has less impact on the arrow. I also wanted to shoot split but whatever works works. I also anchor my middle finger, even shooting 3 under.

Offline N.O.S.guy

  • Trad Bowhunter
  • **
  • Posts: 33
Re: SPLIT VS. 3 UNDER
« Reply #4 on: November 13, 2007, 02:46:00 AM »
I started shooting three fingers under because I had the worst release in the world and shooting split fingered made my arrows fish tail very badly. After a while I switched to split because my Bear recurve was tillered that way and shot better. But as all the other guys here have stated shoot what is comfortable to you. I was at Byron Ferguson's back in July and asked him the same question and his answer was the same. Do what feels good to you. Good luck to you
"Dangon, man... You gotta arra... stickbow and string... lil'ole broadhead... talkin bout ole TWANG man... backstraps are served... know what I mean, man."
Somewhere between West Georgia and Southern Mississippi.

Offline rnharris

  • TGMM Member
  • Trad Bowhunter
  • ***
  • Posts: 514
Re: SPLIT VS. 3 UNDER
« Reply #5 on: November 13, 2007, 07:40:00 AM »
number one goal putting arrow on target shoot the style that you are most accurate with i am more consistantly accurate 3 under but you will find with time you can shoot both ways your bow will be louder most likely 3 under good luck
Ralph
TGMM Family of the Bow

Offline BigCnyn

  • Trad Bowhunter
  • **
  • Posts: 208
Re: SPLIT VS. 3 UNDER
« Reply #6 on: November 13, 2007, 10:28:00 AM »
I started shooting /3 , this fall, I seem to get more comfortable at anchor. It is louder, but the cleaner release for me, makes up for it.. Try it, dont feel right, try something else.

Offline NDTerminator

  • Trad Bowhunter
  • **
  • Posts: 1181
Re: SPLIT VS. 3 UNDER
« Reply #7 on: November 13, 2007, 10:37:00 AM »
Just preaching to the choir here, but I too say do what feels best.

There's absolutely nothing wrong with experimenting with different anchors and shooting styles/methods, though.  Have fun and if you try Split, give yourself time to learn it and work out the bugs.

For the record, I shoot 3 Under.  For me it's a stronger draw, cleaner release, and NO finger pinch (I hate that!)...
"As Trad as I wanna be"

"It's all just archery, and all archery is good"

Offline snag

  • TG HALL OF FAME
  • Trad Bowhunter
  • *****
  • Posts: 6337
Re: SPLIT VS. 3 UNDER
« Reply #8 on: November 13, 2007, 01:25:00 PM »
3 under gets the arrow closer to the eye and allows for less problems with release for me. Think about it, if you have a finger above the arrow and one below you can't always release both at or near the same time. If you are below the last 2 fingers will follow the index fingers lead. Just what works for me. But it is kind of like a golf swing...what works for someone will definitely make you hook or slice it out of bounds!
Isaiah 49:2...he made me a polished arrow and concealed me in his quiver.

Offline jarofclay

  • Trad Bowhunter
  • **
  • Posts: 2
Re: SPLIT VS. 3 UNDER
« Reply #9 on: November 26, 2007, 06:27:00 PM »
I just started doing 3 fingers under, and boy am I glad I found this method.

I was always split...just because...I don't know, I just always have since a kid.

But the "gap" aiming was just too "shaky".

With 3 fingers under, I put the tip of the arrow dead on the target and it hits the target there whether it be 10, 15, or 20 yards.

Don't need a rangefinder  :D .  As long as a know the targets within 20 yards, it's dead on.

I've only tried it out to 20 yards, but that's as far as I need really.

Offline Al Dean

  • TGMM Member
  • Trad Bowhunter
  • ***
  • Posts: 690
Re: SPLIT VS. 3 UNDER
« Reply #10 on: November 26, 2007, 06:58:00 PM »
I went to 3 under a little over a year ago because my index finger was infected and to sore on the corner.  It really improved my accuracy.  Over the last 4 or 5 weeks I have become more and more frustrated at the noise level I could not reduce.  I forced myself back to split.  It was an ugly battle.  Arrows everywhere.  But with my wifes help watching my form and getting my elbow aligned properly I am shooting more accurate than ever.  Of course the 70" HH bow I got 3 weeks ago may have something to do with it.  I just felt that bow should be shot split.  It has also reduced my noise levels greatly.  Also I anchor middle finger corner of mouth, index finger under and touching nostril.
TGMM Family of the Bow

Offline John 4

  • Trad Bowhunter
  • **
  • Posts: 82
Re: SPLIT VS. 3 UNDER
« Reply #11 on: November 27, 2007, 02:13:00 AM »
All the great don't shoot split finger.
Ok maybe they ain't so great,,,but Ricky Welsh shoots 3 under,Rod Jenkins shoots 3 under.
Hey,I take that back,,both Ricky and Rod are great.
Oh yeah,I won the Pacific 3D Championship Recurve unaided title, held between Australia and New Zealand last weekend and I also shoot 3 under,,,still not so great though,,,cheers.

Offline 30coupe

  • Trad Bowhunter
  • **
  • Posts: 3114
Re: SPLIT VS. 3 UNDER
« Reply #12 on: November 29, 2007, 12:19:00 AM »
If your index finger is sore from shooting split finger, most likely your elbow is too high and you are torquing the string. I was having the same problem when I switched from 3 under to split. Once I figured out that my elbow as too high, my finger stopped hurting. Split is quieter and I feel that I have better control of the arrow, especially in hunting situations.

If you are more comfortable with 3 under, use it. I don't think the noise has much effect on game. I have shot deer using 3 under and they didn't complain about the noise.   ;)
Kanati 58" 44# @ 28" Green glass on a green riser
Bear Kodiak Magnum 52" 45# @ 28"
Bodnik Slick Stick longbow 58" 40# @ 28"
Bodnik Kiowa 52" 45# @ 28"
Kanati 58" 46# @ 28" R.I.P (2007-2015)
Self-made Silk backed Hickory Board bow 67" 49# @ 28"
Bear Black Bear 60" 45# @28"
NRA Life Member

Offline cvarcher

  • Trad Bowhunter
  • **
  • Posts: 255
Re: SPLIT VS. 3 UNDER
« Reply #13 on: November 29, 2007, 09:08:00 AM »
question? If you shoot three under is your nocking point mark on the string above your arrow nocks ? If so, then you cant load that second arrow quick in case of a first arrow miss. You may also need to be looking down at your loading the arrow that way. With split you have a little more control over the arrow and dont need to look at loading at all just focusing on the game. Thats the way Howard shot.No body could beat him . I didnt say what was more comfortable or do not try split method only. Merely pointing out why the split fingered method is good.

Offline flatlander37

  • Trad Bowhunter
  • **
  • Posts: 487
Re: SPLIT VS. 3 UNDER
« Reply #14 on: November 29, 2007, 07:02:00 PM »
When I started shooting trad I shot split because that was the example at the time.  I now shoot three under because it feels much better to me and I am more consistent with it.  I shot a doe just this year using it, and I don't notice any more noise with shooting this way.  Mark
"Better to be thought a fool, than to open one's mouth and remove all doubt"-Abe Lincoln

Offline Jason R. Wesbrock

  • Trad Bowhunter
  • **
  • Posts: 2507
Re: SPLIT VS. 3 UNDER
« Reply #15 on: November 29, 2007, 08:50:00 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by cvarcher:
question? If you shoot three under is your nocking point mark on the string above your arrow nocks ? If so, then you cant load that second arrow quick in case of a first arrow miss.  
Sorry, but there's absolutely no reason you can't nock a second shot just as fast under the nock point as over.

Offline dragonheart

  • TG HALL OF FAME
  • Trad Bowhunter
  • *****
  • Posts: 3593
Re: SPLIT VS. 3 UNDER
« Reply #16 on: November 30, 2007, 12:43:00 AM »
Here is a tip.  Many archers will overtime allow there fingers to uncurl from the string prior to the loose and on the draw.  This is a bad habit that happens quickly with some and develops over years with others, but it leads to a lose of control.    

I think with threeunder there is less of a likelyhood of this happening due to there being no arrow nock between the first and second finger.  Next time you shoot, as an experiment, shoot split finger but when you "hook up" on the string, middle finger on the string first then place the other 2.  Really curl your fingertips back towards you, I mean past 90 degrees.  Hook all the way to the first joint, even slightly past on the middle finger.  As you draw back, PUSH your drawing elbow back, anchor with middle finger in corner of mouth, anchor, keep pushing the draw elbow back and REFUSE to hold.  Allow the back of the hand to relax, not the fingers.  If you have tension in your back, and you will if you drew right, the string will in essance push the fingers out of the way at the same time.

The other issue is string twist.  If you will stand in front of a full length mirror and draw a bow, (don't shoot the mirror, the wife will get PO!) you may see the string twisted where your fingers are, doin a weird "S".  For a release to be executed properly you need to have you third finger well into the string, your elbow in line with the arrow from side view, and your string with as little twist at full draw from the critter's view (frontal/mirror).

I believe it is easier for 3fingersunder to "hook up" on the string, ergomonically if you will, in the proper position prior to the bow being drawn.  I believe that 3under is no more inheirently accurate than split if both are EXECUTED properly.  

If you shoot gap, I believe 3under is probably better to cut the distance from eye to back of arrow to point, lowers your point on, and does give a solid anchor.  It feels weird with a longbow to me(maybe it is the lower mass bow weight, maybe it is in my head!).  With a recurve, 3under is not an issue for me.

I shoot split with LB, try hooking up well curled, refuse to hold instead of releasing, push draw elbow back instead of pulling the bow back.  I believe if you give this a try for a while you will notice less left, right and up and down issues with arrow flight.  Do not try to hit anything for at least one to two weeks.  You are reprogramming your hair covered computer.  I would be willing to gues you will cheat and shoot before the week is up uop at a "target".  You will probably notice improvement, but your other habit will come back quickly.  Give it time, and an honest try.

Shoot at a blank bale and just pick a spot.  If you try to hit a target like a bullseye and change your technique it just wont work.  If you are shooting at a game animal,  concentrate on a small spot only.  Do not think about form/technique if you are shooting at something that will bleed.  You got what form you have trained at that moment.  If you can get your hands on the book "Understanding winning archery" by Al Henderson, he goes into detail about this.  

Longbows & Short Shots,
Jeff Schulz

PS:  Have fun with archery, always works towards perfecting your craft, and pass it on.  It truly is; as Jim Ploen used to say the "Sport of Kings".
Longbows & Short Shots

Offline cvarcher

  • Trad Bowhunter
  • **
  • Posts: 255
Re: SPLIT VS. 3 UNDER
« Reply #17 on: November 30, 2007, 09:07:00 AM »
Jason, you will have to look down at the string to load and slide up to the nocking point. When you nock over the point you simply funnel trap the arrows nock to the string and slide down to the nock which you can do without looking. It saves precisous seconds. I cant tell you how many times Ive needed second and even thrid follow ups when things are unfolding fast. You dont even think about it it practically loads itself. Try it.Or watch John Shultz show you on the video.

Offline Jason R. Wesbrock

  • Trad Bowhunter
  • **
  • Posts: 2507
Re: SPLIT VS. 3 UNDER
« Reply #18 on: November 30, 2007, 01:07:00 PM »
cvarcher,

I don't have to look down to nock a second arrow. I do the same thing as you, only I slide mine up whereas you slide yours down. Honestly, it's a non-issue.

Offline jcp161

  • Contributing Member
  • Trad Bowhunter
  • ****
  • Posts: 133
Re: SPLIT VS. 3 UNDER
« Reply #19 on: December 08, 2007, 05:55:00 AM »
Does anyone know if shooting three under causes any extra stress to the bow limbs or require the bow to be tillered to accomodate it? I have a 56" GN Ghost that shoots great but pinches with split finger. I'd like to try it shooting with three under but don't want to make it a homemade jackknife.   :)
"In bow hunting, the goal is not marksmanship but shooting well. And shooting well, after all, is merely a matter of only taking shots you can make."-Hunting from Home-Christopher Camuto

Users currently browsing this topic:

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
 

Contact Us | Trad Gang.com © | User Agreement

Copyright 2003 thru 2024 ~ Trad Gang.com ©