CJC & Jack Aldridge,
I respectfully disagree. First to address the comment by CJC, where he stated that elevated rest will improve arrow flight, and that it is not traditional enough, or that arrow flight is not important.
Plenty of traditional guys shoot elevated rest. They were around when I started in the 60's. I don't choose to shoot one, and I find that my tune is as good as any you can get off a rest.
What have you based that comment on? Is it just your experience, or have you done some research?
If your statement was true, where are there so many "Great" archers of all styles not using elevated rest. Some of these guys make a living at what they do. I would think that if a rest would give them an edge they would use it.
I have, I have known and shot with some of best these guys. Their bows are well tuned regardless of how they were set up.
I shot field archery for ten years, worked in a pro-shop where I was the archery tech. there I setup all types of bows, and at 53 years of age, been shooting seriously since I was 9 or 10.
I bareshaft my arrows at thirty yards, have done it farther. My bare shafts fly better than a lot of guys feathered shafts.
Now I will agree that someone who has little experience with arrow selection, understanding of FOC, arrow spine, characteristics between recurves, longbows, self bows can get servicable results with an elevated rest.
Having said that, tuning is tuning, it is not something you do in a few minutes, the more you do it, the better you get at it. If you can't do it off the shelf, it is likely that the tune you get shooting off the rest won't be as good as you can get it.
What people forget is that just because the arrow gets to where you want it to go, unless it is flying to the spot in the most efficient way, it will not be flying at the optumium speed, or hitting with maxium force. If these things are not happening, no matter where the darn thing hits, your arrow flight is not tuned. These things are of the utmost importance for hunting, I guess if you are just shooting foam, it won't matter.
I would suggest that a person should shoot an elevated rest because they want to shoot an elevated rest. But to make some blanket statement, which is untrue, is not.
Make no mistake, I don't shoot off the shelf because I think it makes me better than someone who chooses not to. I have stated my reasons for my choice.
I would be a fool to continue to shoot off the shelf if it were better to do the other.
Should I decide to shoot a gap, I assure you I will be shooting off an elevated rest. Until that time, make mine the shelf.
**************************************************************************************************
Mr. Aldridge, to address your question, a valid one I might add.
If a shooter is shooting instinctive, they would generally have a more difficult time, notice I said "Generally" with an elevated rest.
The answer is very simple, instinctive shooting is about pointing the bow hand.
That is one of the reasons that most gap shooters, perfer the elevated rest. It gets the arrow up where it is easier to see. Most of the best "Gap shooters" shoot a verticle bow.
The closer the arrow is to the hand, the better the pointing for an instinctive shooter.
Another reason a person might perfer not to shoot an elevated rest would be the "cant" factor. I, like many traditional archers, shoot with a canted bow. The altered path of the arrow is much less affected when the arrow and the hand are close together.
When you raise that arrow, and you cant, it destroys that, in fact the more you cant, it in fact moves the arrow to the left or right, depending if you are left or right handed.
I am speaking of instinctive shooters specificlly, but even for those who shoot other styles may fine that true.
I have now stepped off of my "Soap Box", I am awaiting comments from others. After all, that is why I come here.