Shooters Forum

Contribute to Trad Gang
Become a Trad Gang Sponsor



Author Topic: dead release vs. back tension  (Read 2386 times)

Offline Wmangham

  • Trad Bowhunter
  • **
  • Posts: 8
dead release vs. back tension
« on: September 15, 2009, 06:41:00 PM »
Hello fellas it is the new guy in the gang and I was wanting to get some good advice on which would be a better choice for everyday shooting. Ever since I have been shooting I have used the back tension release and it has worked well for me but now I have this problem of holding back to long and not concentrating. I just want to try something new, which is the better choice?   :help:

Offline NorthernCaliforniaHunter

  • Trad Bowhunter
  • **
  • Posts: 1563
Re: dead release vs. back tension
« Reply #1 on: September 15, 2009, 06:50:00 PM »
My shot placement is far superior when I pick a spot, lift the bow and consciously draw all the way through the arrow leaving the bow - "back tension". There is deteriorating chance of hitting my spot the longer I think about the variables. In other words, it all comes together when I trust my muscles and the 'feel' of the draw and falls apart when I over analyze.

Get out there and just put the arrow where you're looking. Seriously, that's it.
"...there are no words that can tell the hidden spirit of the wilderness, that can reveal its mystery, it's melancholy, and its charm." Theodore Roosevelt

Find me at ShareTheBounty

Online McDave

  • TG HALL OF FAME
  • Trad Bowhunter
  • *****
  • Posts: 6085
Re: dead release vs. back tension
« Reply #2 on: September 16, 2009, 02:17:00 PM »
Rick Welch favors the dead release, and Rod Jenkins favors more of a dynamic followthrough, where your hand ends up moving back after releasing the arrow.  Both are champion shots, and both have videos out that you can compare.

"Dead release vs. back tension" is a misnomer.  Any good shooter, whether he uses a dead release or uses a more dynamic release, will absolutely maintain back tension throughout the shot.  Any collapsing of back tension, which is evidenced by a creeping forward of the string hand at full draw, will ruin the shot.  The difference between a dead release and a dynamic release is that the forces between the bow and the back exactly balance in a dead release, while the force of the back gradually increases through release with a dynamic release.

My own opinion, after studying both methods, is that it is easier to maintain back tension if I am gradually increasing back tension until the arrow is released.  If I am gradually increasing back tension, my back tension is not likely to collapse.  If I'm trying to hold a specific amount of back tension, it could go either way without me really being aware of it.  But the dead release certainly works well for Rick Welch, and many of his students.

Both Rick Welch and Rod Jenkins believe that more accuracy can be achieved by holding at full draw for a second or two than by releasing as soon as full draw is reached.  If you're having a problem releasing after holding for a second or two, that may be a type of target panic, and you might be better off addressing that problem rather than trying to change something else.
TGMM Family of the Bow

Technology....the knack of arranging the world so that we don't have to experience it.

Offline Don Stokes

  • Tradbowhunter
  • Trad Bowhunter
  • *
  • Posts: 2607
Re: dead release vs. back tension
« Reply #3 on: September 16, 2009, 03:37:00 PM »
It's hard for me to differentiate between the two. I find that if I don't feel like I'm slowly increasing the back tension while I hold for that second, the arrow will creep forward. Can't seem to get "dead".
Those who would give up essential liberty to purchase a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety.- Ben Franklin

Offline TSP

  • Trad Bowhunter
  • **
  • Posts: 1005
Re: dead release vs. back tension
« Reply #4 on: September 29, 2009, 07:31:00 PM »
Seems like if during the shot you focus on developing your sight picture (i.e, concentrate on the spot) and have a decent repeatable anchor then the after-mechanics of how you release the string won't much matter.  

Maybe sometimes we over-analyze.

Offline zetabow

  • Trad Bowhunter
  • **
  • Posts: 376
Re: dead release vs. back tension
« Reply #5 on: October 01, 2009, 02:30:00 AM »
"Rick Welch favors the dead release, and Rod Jenkins favors more of a dynamic followthrough"

From the video clips I've seen of Ricky he hasn't got a "Dead release" it's just not as dynamic as Rods.

A Dead release is where the hand doesn't move at all and it doesn't really work, best way to test this theory is shoot a doz arrows with Dead Release and a doz with a more dynamic release at 50 yards and see the difference, at 15-20 yards you can get away with a lot of form errors like Dead Release.

Online smokin joe

  • Contributing Member
  • Trad Bowhunter
  • ****
  • Posts: 3018
Re: dead release vs. back tension
« Reply #6 on: October 01, 2009, 08:18:00 AM »
I am not sure that a dead release is really dead still. I tried an experiment to see. My release is pretty dead still. I backed up against my garage door and had my right elbow (I'm right handed) about two inches from the door. If my release is dead I won't touch the door, right? Well I banged the door with my elbow, but my hand came back to my anchor point and, except for hitting my elbow on the door, my release felt as dead still as ever.
Maybe the so-called dead release is an illusion. I know my dead release moves and then returns to the anchor. I thought I was being still, but that is not the case. At release my mind is on the target and I don't feel the release until my hand is back to the anchor point, but I do in fact move.
What does this experiment prove? Just that what I thought was happening wasn't what was actually happening. Interesting...
Of course, I am not going to alter anything as long as I am shooting OK.
Joe
TGMM
Compton
PBS
Trad Gang Hall of Fame

Offline cedar swampman

  • Trad Bowhunter
  • **
  • Posts: 119
Re: dead release vs. back tension
« Reply #7 on: October 01, 2009, 08:45:00 AM »
According to Rick Welch a subconscious release with good back tension = perfect release and follow through. If you are mentally thinking about releasing all kinds of bad things can happen- plucking, collapsing movement etc.

Offline Tim Fishell

  • Moderator
  • Trad Bowhunter
  • ***
  • Posts: 3772
Re: dead release vs. back tension
« Reply #8 on: October 01, 2009, 09:17:00 AM »
Either release requires back tension.  Like Dave has said above the pull through release happens more naturally when you gradually increase back tension.  That being said I have seen many great shooters shoot with great accuracy using a dead release.  A good example of this is Ron LaClair in the first Masters of the Barebow.  He uses a dead release and is very accurate out to 50-60 yards.
Dreams can not be bought; they are free to those who have lived. -Mike Mitten

We must go beyond the textbooks, go out into the untrodden depths of the wilderness & travel & explore & tell the world the glories of our journey

TGMM Family of the Bow

Offline ChristopherO

  • Trad Bowhunter
  • **
  • Posts: 933
Re: dead release vs. back tension
« Reply #9 on: October 01, 2009, 01:23:00 PM »
I'm a fairly novice shooter but when I don't keep my hand, or thumb, against my face at release it becomes a hand flinging session.  I have had to consciously tell my self this summer during practice the following mantra:  "Keep the bow arm still and touch my face."  The bow arm comment is pretty self explainatory due to dropping that arm but the touching the face simply means that once I release the arrow, at minimum, the tip of the thumb has to stay connected to my cheek for best results.
Granted, if I were to condition myself to allow my hand continue back at release to touch my shoulder it may accomplish the same result but I've not tried that.  This works for me to keep my form and tension together at the shot.

Online McDave

  • TG HALL OF FAME
  • Trad Bowhunter
  • *****
  • Posts: 6085
Re: dead release vs. back tension
« Reply #10 on: October 01, 2009, 02:00:00 PM »
It's generally a mistake to try to make your string hand do anything on release, or to try to make it not do anything, as in the case of holding it against your face to avoid flinging your hand.

You should use your string hand as an indication of how well you are releasing the arrow.  Just notice what it does; don't try to stop it from doing it.  Stopping your string hand from doing whatever it does just masks the symptoms.

You should be able to hold your string hand totally away from your face, as Rick Welch recommends, and either have it stay (more or less) in one place, or move backwards.  If it's doing anything other than that, it probably means you're not coming to full draw, such that your forearm is in line with the arrow viewed from above, not maintaining back tension while you're holding, or that you're anticipating your release and not getting a clean, subconscious release.
TGMM Family of the Bow

Technology....the knack of arranging the world so that we don't have to experience it.

Offline zetabow

  • Trad Bowhunter
  • **
  • Posts: 376
Re: dead release vs. back tension
« Reply #11 on: October 01, 2009, 03:08:00 PM »
Holding the string hand locked against the face at moment of release is what I consider dead release and I see a lot of it around.

Anticipating the release is the next big error and normally go's hand in hand with the Dead release because if your just holding against your face you have to trigger the release somehow. It may feel\\look good in practice but once you add a little pressure on yourself to score the dead release will in most cases just fall apart make your shooting look terrible.

The 'Anchor' is a misleading Archery phrase, really it's just a momentary (few seconds) pause or touch point on the face as your pulling through the shot.

Good post McDave

Offline sweet old bill

  • Trad Bowhunter
  • **
  • Posts: 505
Re: dead release vs. back tension
« Reply #12 on: October 08, 2009, 06:49:00 AM »
I have to go with Zetabow on what is the way to go. A very long time ago in the 70's one of the best trad shooters I shoot with always said the shot sequence was that as you draw you draw thru the shot sequence that is when you lock in your ancor you continue to draw and then release. I find I get the the shots as I try to use the kiss
archery for trad archery and that is

" KEEP IT SIMPLE STUPID ''

The more I try to make shooting a bow a engineering process the more I shoot poorly.

pick a spot, aim, release

seems to me a simple way to master our art of archery.
you should see how I use to shoot
Sand dune archers Myrtle beach SC
Senior archers of Oneonta NY

Offline Paul WA

  • Trad Bowhunter
  • **
  • Posts: 786
Re: dead release vs. back tension
« Reply #13 on: October 12, 2009, 01:19:00 PM »
draw through the shot. Some seem to creep with a dead anchor...PR
"I'm a trophy hunter till something else comes along"

Offline dragon rider

  • Contributing Member
  • Trad Bowhunter
  • ****
  • Posts: 834
Re: dead release vs. back tension
« Reply #14 on: October 13, 2009, 08:51:00 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by zetabow:
if your just holding against your face you have to trigger the release somehow.
 
Whether you're holding against your face or pulling through you have to do the same thing - relax your fingers so the string slips out without being jerked or plucked.  The choice between "dead" and "dynamic" boils down to which method allows you most easily to do as close as humanly possible to exactly the same thing on each shot.  

Paraphrasing Rick Welch slightly, you can release with your teeth and learn to be accurate if you use a consistent method to make each shot.
Don't meddle in the affairs of dragons; people are crunchy and taste good with ketchup.

TGMM Family of the Bow

Offline zetabow

  • Trad Bowhunter
  • **
  • Posts: 376
Re: dead release vs. back tension
« Reply #15 on: October 14, 2009, 01:04:00 AM »
Quote
Originally posted by dragon rider:
 
Quote
Originally posted by zetabow:
if your just holding against your face you have to trigger the release somehow.
 
Whether you're holding against your face or pulling through you have to do the same thing - relax your fingers so the string slips out without being jerked or plucked.  The choice between "dead" and "dynamic" boils down to which method allows you most easily to do as close as humanly possible to exactly the same thing on each shot.  

Paraphrasing Rick Welch slightly, you can release with your teeth and learn to be accurate if you use a consistent method to make each shot. [/b]
If you’re just holding against your face for a dead release with no proper back tension, you will not be consistent or accurate. The release is not an action in itself it’s a consequence of a relaxed Bow arm\\hand and increasing back tension. If you need to have ‘Release’ flash through your conscious or subconscious mind to be able to release it WILL have a negative impact on your consistency and accuracy..

The more pressured the shot the Dead Release becomes even more inconsistent.

Offline Hud

  • Contributing Member
  • Trad Bowhunter
  • ****
  • Posts: 2242
  • 360-921-5779
Re: dead release vs. back tension
« Reply #16 on: October 14, 2009, 09:53:00 PM »
I would suggest getting a book or DVD that was put out by John Schulz, "Hitting Them Like Howard Hill". He will explain the method used by Howard Hill, who was the best shot ever, and the best I have seen. Fred Bear used a very similar style. Back tension is important, but holding on target is not; the arrow is gone at full draw. See is believing, shooting this way is enjoyable, and very accurate.
TGMM Family of the Bow

Offline dragon rider

  • Contributing Member
  • Trad Bowhunter
  • ****
  • Posts: 834
Re: dead release vs. back tension
« Reply #17 on: October 15, 2009, 10:34:00 AM »
Don't meddle in the affairs of dragons; people are crunchy and taste good with ketchup.

TGMM Family of the Bow

Offline zetabow

  • Trad Bowhunter
  • **
  • Posts: 376
Re: dead release vs. back tension
« Reply #18 on: October 15, 2009, 03:07:00 PM »
[/QUOTE]I think what we have here is a failure to communicate.  
[/QUOTE]

Yep seems so.

If you read one of my previous posts I explained that was talking about people who lock their Bowhand (like an Anchor) and try and hold it locked on face at moment of release, most are not using back tension and most of them either creep, collapse or fly the hand out sideways.

Maintaining steady push\\pull until release happens does work to a degree but can still open the Archer up to inconsistencies.

shoot straight   :)

Offline dragon rider

  • Contributing Member
  • Trad Bowhunter
  • ****
  • Posts: 834
Re: dead release vs. back tension
« Reply #19 on: October 16, 2009, 01:34:00 PM »
OK, we are in agreement; whether you use dead or dynamic release, you're not going to succeed consistently without proper back tension and string creep, draw collapse or letting your bow hand fly around will lead to inconsistencies.  Looking at a number of really good shots, I don't think it makes much, if any, difference, where your string hand goes once the shot is away; it's where it goes until the string has left your fingers that matters.

Good shooting; have fun.
Don't meddle in the affairs of dragons; people are crunchy and taste good with ketchup.

TGMM Family of the Bow

Users currently browsing this topic:

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
 

Contact Us | Trad Gang.com © | User Agreement

Copyright 2003 thru 2024 ~ Trad Gang.com ©