Shooters Forum

Contribute to Trad Gang
Become a Trad Gang Sponsor



Author Topic: 'Anchor' versus 'Reference'  (Read 3554 times)

Offline robtattoo

  • TGMM Member
  • Trad Bowhunter
  • ***
  • Posts: 3588
'Anchor' versus 'Reference'
« on: February 25, 2010, 01:07:00 PM »
Everyone talks about 'anchor' points. Be it a tooth, corner of the mouth, cheekbone, whatever, it's always referred to as the 'Anchor'
I'd like to mention here something that my old archery coach taught me a few years ago.

"If you think of it as an anchor, that's what it becomes. It'll stop you dead in your tracks."

Instead, if you think of it as a 'reference point' you won't stop there. Ideally we should be looking to reach our 'reference' just as we run out of muscle & need to start correctly applying back tension. If we come to our reference & then expand into the shot/release/follow through sequence of the shot, you'll notice that;

a) the drawlength will inrease slightly
b) the release will be cleaner & smoother
c) the follow through will be straight back
& d) the drawing hand doesn't ever actually stop.

If you watch Terry's videos of him shooting, you'll notice that he never actually stops his draw. He comes up to his refernce & continues to expand until full draw is reached & thenreleases the arrow in one fluid motion. David Sosza demonstrates this very clearly in Masters of the Barebow (Either Vol 1 or 2, I forget which)
If you watch Rod Jenkins shoot, he comes to his reference & then mometarily stops to adjust his gap. He doesn't then just release the string, he continues to expand through the shot.

This final expansion need not be a long haul back, it need only be a fraction of an inch, but the point is, it is a continuation of the draw, after your reference has been reached.

Just an observation.
"I came into this world, kicking, screaming & covered in someone else's blood. I have no problem going out the same way"

PBS & TBT Member

>>---TGMM, Family of the Bow--->

Offline HATCHCHASER

  • Trad Bowhunter
  • **
  • Posts: 1215
Re: 'Anchor' versus 'Reference'
« Reply #1 on: February 25, 2010, 06:22:00 PM »
I'm just starting to learn that.  Thanks man you explained it perfectly.
It's not the arrival, it's the journey.

Online Over&Under

  • TG HALL OF FAME
  • Trad Bowhunter
  • *****
  • Posts: 5108
Re: 'Anchor' versus 'Reference'
« Reply #2 on: February 26, 2010, 05:26:00 PM »
Rob

Well stated.  I do agree the thought/concept of an anchor can do just that, cause your mind to stop the draw.  Thinking in terms of a reference point may help some to still reach full draw, but then keep pulling through the shot.

Good post!
“Elk (add hogs to the list) are not hard to hit....they're just easy to miss"          :)
TGMM

Offline LP Kelley

  • Trad Bowhunter
  • **
  • Posts: 36
Re: 'Anchor' versus 'Reference'
« Reply #3 on: February 28, 2010, 10:40:00 AM »
Rob,

'Reference point'

Great post! Mighty sage advice!

Should be a sticky to the top.

Offline Guru

  • Trad Bowhunter
  • **
  • Posts: 11447
Re: 'Anchor' versus 'Reference'
« Reply #4 on: February 28, 2010, 04:53:00 PM »
Good stuff Rob    :thumbsup:
Curt } >>--->   

"I love you Daddy".......My son Cade while stump shooting  3/19/06

Offline Covey

  • Trad Bowhunter
  • **
  • Posts: 1827
Re: 'Anchor' versus 'Reference'
« Reply #5 on: February 28, 2010, 09:04:00 PM »
I've watched Terry on the Bowhunters of Tradgang, probably 50 times. I started doing this a few month's ago. My shot and form have definitely come around and I actually know exactly what to do every time. If my shot is off, I can fix it purdy quick. Being self taught, this is like a breath of fresh air. Thank's guy's for never ending help!! Jason

Offline Gene R

  • Trad Bowhunter
  • **
  • Posts: 89
Re: 'Anchor' versus 'Reference'
« Reply #6 on: March 06, 2010, 08:01:00 AM »
Great Explanation of a perfect release! Thank you. Gene

Offline freefeet

  • Trad Bowhunter
  • **
  • Posts: 381
Re: 'Anchor' versus 'Reference'
« Reply #7 on: March 06, 2010, 09:30:00 AM »
Good post Rob!

I do find that i have to stop at my anchor/reference for a moment to ensure i get it consistent, but i do then expand after that.

Hopefully as i get my anchor/reference more ingrained in muscle memory the moment will gradually become shorter and maybe disappear completely, but at the moment it's still not ingrained and i do need that moment else my arrows start going everywhere as i lose consistency.

I would add that i recently switched from a full shot glove to taped fingers and the whole anchor/reference has a very different feel that i'm having to learn from scratch again.

Any constructive criticism would be appreciated.
Shoes are a tax on walking...

...free your feet, your mind will follow!

Offline robtattoo

  • TGMM Member
  • Trad Bowhunter
  • ***
  • Posts: 3588
Re: 'Anchor' versus 'Reference'
« Reply #8 on: March 06, 2010, 11:55:00 AM »
Thanks y'all!  :D

There's absolutey nothing wrong with pausing momentarily at your reference point. The thing to remember is that it's not a stopping point, just an indicator that you need to expand from.
That's exactly how I personally shoot. I never actually stop the draw, I just briefly pause to get my target picture right in my mind (maybe a second) then expand through the release/follow through sequence of my shot.

I also find it really handy to have a very light bow to practice with. I'll often pick up The Wife's 28# target bow, just to run through this sequence. It's just heavy enough that I can correctly feel my alignment & back tension, but light enough that I can do it all day long, slowly, without the chance of over straining myself.
"I came into this world, kicking, screaming & covered in someone else's blood. I have no problem going out the same way"

PBS & TBT Member

>>---TGMM, Family of the Bow--->

Online Terry Green

  • Administrator
  • Trad Bowhunter
  • ****
  • Posts: 28715
Re: 'Anchor' versus 'Reference'
« Reply #9 on: March 06, 2010, 12:52:00 PM »
Yes, that IS a great tip.....here's my saying on the subject...

'An anchor point should never be a resting place....but instead, an evolution to execution.'
Tradbowhunting Video Store - https://digitalstore.tradgang.com/

Tradgang Bowhunting Merchandise - https://tradgang.creator-spring.com/?

Tradgang DVD - https://www.tradgang.com/tgstore/index.html

"It's important,  when going after a goal, to never lose sight of the integrity of the journey" - Andy Garcia

'An anchor point is not a destination, its  an evolution to conclusion'

Offline jacobsladder

  • TGMM Member
  • Trad Bowhunter
  • ***
  • Posts: 3161
Re: 'Anchor' versus 'Reference'
« Reply #10 on: March 06, 2010, 01:12:00 PM »
yep...what terry and rob said....my anchor point is where i end up at full draw....then it becomes a starting point to finish off the shot...hope that makes sense....
TGMM Family of the Bow

"There's a race of men that dont fit in, A race that can't stay still; So they break the hearts of kith and kin, And they roam the world at will"  Robert Service

Offline owlbait

  • Trad Bowhunter
  • **
  • Posts: 4774
Re: 'Anchor' versus 'Reference'
« Reply #11 on: March 06, 2010, 03:41:00 PM »
Nailed Robtatoo! I find when my shooting starts to scatter that I'm not meeting that reference point before I expand to conclusion. I don't feel the back tension I need. Thanks for a great explanation and reminder.
Advice from The Buck:"Only little girls shoot spikers!"

Offline Pete Darby

  • Trad Bowhunter
  • **
  • Posts: 124
Re: 'Anchor' versus 'Reference'
« Reply #12 on: March 10, 2010, 08:47:00 AM »
Very well said.  I tell people that the two worst words in archery are anchor and release.  I tell newbies that they are reference points and relaxing the fingers.  I can hold a solid face anchor and vary the draw length up to three inches and still be at a solid never moving face anchor. I can't vary my draw length at all if at anchor.   And it requires an almost herculean effort to pluck or creep upon release if I am at anchor and do my elbow movement correctly.
Pete Darby

Offline Kevin Winkler

  • Trad Bowhunter
  • **
  • Posts: 690
Re: 'Anchor' versus 'Reference'
« Reply #13 on: March 11, 2010, 12:56:00 PM »
Right on Rob    :thumbsup:  
You guys are so right! My shooting really improved last year after I read a post here on Trad Gang that stated when you reach your anchor/reference it is the beginning of the shot not the end!

After I thought about that for a while, It was like...Duh! That's it! It changed my whole shot process and did it ever improve my shooting.
It's only been a little over two years now, since I have come back to shooting Trad. But that one post made a real big difference for me!

I also made up some Formasters from a post here on Trad Gang and use one regularly to help me keep my form in tune.
Thanks to all who contribute to this site.    :notworthy:  
It has helped me and I enjoy being part of it.
PBS Associate, Ask me about The Professional Bowhunters Society; we stand for ethics.
Life Member, WI Traditional Archers
Life Member, WI Bowhunters Association

Offline BobCo 1965

  • Trad Bowhunter
  • **
  • Posts: 1364
Re: 'Anchor' versus 'Reference'
« Reply #14 on: March 11, 2010, 01:09:00 PM »
Good post Rob!

Personally, my real anchor is in my back. It is the point where linear travel of the arrow stops and expansion begins. All points on the face, neck, nose, jaw, ear, etc are reference points.

Online Terry Green

  • Administrator
  • Trad Bowhunter
  • ****
  • Posts: 28715
Re: 'Anchor' versus 'Reference'
« Reply #15 on: March 13, 2010, 02:44:00 PM »
TTT
Tradbowhunting Video Store - https://digitalstore.tradgang.com/

Tradgang Bowhunting Merchandise - https://tradgang.creator-spring.com/?

Tradgang DVD - https://www.tradgang.com/tgstore/index.html

"It's important,  when going after a goal, to never lose sight of the integrity of the journey" - Andy Garcia

'An anchor point is not a destination, its  an evolution to conclusion'

Offline Soilarch

  • Trad Bowhunter
  • **
  • Posts: 591
Re: 'Anchor' versus 'Reference'
« Reply #16 on: March 16, 2010, 12:07:00 AM »
Thank You!!!


It's amazing how powerful "words" are.  The things we associate with them have a huge impact on how/what we think when we use them

I've never sat down and thought about it, but it certainly is easy (and probably not good) for us to think of it as a "lock-down" point...when in reality it should be just what you describe: a reference to let us know everything is in check and going as planned.

I'll throw the idea out there I'm gonna start using the term "checkpoint".  For me, that means a place you can stop at or move on through, but you must get THERE first before you worry about moving on.

I think those that come from a compound background (like me) are especially susceptible to the anchor=lockdown bug.
Micah 6:8

Offline zetabow

  • Trad Bowhunter
  • **
  • Posts: 376
Re: 'Anchor' versus 'Reference'
« Reply #17 on: March 16, 2010, 03:48:00 AM »
The description of reference point I think is better than Anchor as Anchor implies that it’s fixed and unmoving and lot of people make the mistake of stopping when reaching Anchor, having a solid fixed Anchor does work, I used it in my early days, my experience is that every now and then you have a flier, the more fluid form where you are using an Anchor reference and expanding through the shot is so much more consistent and the only fliers I have is because I was lazy and didn’t expand correctly.

Correct form initially is quite hard disciplined work compared to just holding at Anchor and takes a lot for me to convince my students to make the change, as to them their fixed anchor is giving them respectable results and making the change requires a step backwards in accuracy before they see an improvement, if they get past this they never go back to fixed\\locked Anchor.

As a tourney Longbow shooter I’m not allowed to use a Clicker but I have trained my mind to have a virtual clicker, it allows me to find my reference anchor and keep expanding through the shot, I find this kind of visualization a very powerful tool for good Form. I also use the same visualization techniques to help my aiming.         :)

Offline Straight Shootin'

  • Trad Bowhunter
  • **
  • Posts: 233
Re: 'Anchor' versus 'Reference'
« Reply #18 on: March 16, 2010, 08:20:00 AM »
Excellent post, tks all!!
USN(RET) 1977-99
SOM 2001-2019

52" Fedora Stalker
Bear K-Mag x2
Predator Velocity 60"

"If you are not working to protect hunting, then you are working to destroy it." -- Fred Bear

Offline wapitimike1

  • Trad Bowhunter
  • **
  • Posts: 681
Re: 'Anchor' versus 'Reference'
« Reply #19 on: April 27, 2010, 05:22:00 AM »
I'd have to say I hang on to my reference point/anchor for close to 3 seconds. I shoot best with a double ref point. The string to my eye lid and ring finger to the corner of my mouth into my choppers.
 I shoot my best coming to full draw locking onto the target.  At the last split second I expand slightly before loosing the arrow.

Users currently browsing this topic:

0 Members and 3 Guests are viewing this topic.
 

Contact Us | Trad Gang.com © | User Agreement

Copyright 2003 thru 2024 ~ Trad Gang.com ©