I shoot instinctively at distances up to 30 yards or so, where the arrow point is enough below my target that I don't notice it.
At some point, which for me is about 40 yards, the arrow point blots out the target (my point-on distance). I don't see how I could ignore the arrow bloting out the target at 40 yards, or stated conversely, if I'm shooting at a target about 40 yards away, I expect to see the arrow blotting out the target. At 50 yards, it should be about a yard over the target. I've just shot long enough that I know that information, and knowing that, I can't say that I shoot instinctively at distances where the arrow tip is an obvious part of my sight picture.
And knowing that, I can learn from where my first arrow hits, and by changing the orientation of the arrow tip to the target, place my second arrow more accurately than the first, just like Howard Hill did, unless I blow my form, which of course Howard Hill didn't.
I'm not saying that no one shoots instinctively at distances around their point-on. I've seen where those arguments go, and it ain't pretty. I'm just saying that if it looks like a 40 yard shot, I expect to see my arrow point on the target, slightly above for a 45 yard shot, etc. Even if I didn't know what "40 yards" was, I would still expect to see my arrow point on the target at a certain distance to the target (which I know is 40 yards). I can't ignore that information; maybe others can.