These kinds of discussions are just another interesting part of the game. I like that there still are folks (like me) interested in the simpler styles of shooting, simpler meaning the kinds of form and gear (like Hill-style bows and simple wood arrows) that aren't normally associated with competitive target shooting. Nothing wrong with well-structured competition, but for me the constant tedious technical breakdowns and rationalizations of every minute facet of every mechnical effort involved with learning to shoot competitive scores just plain takes the fun out of it. Does the average bowhunter (who generally hunts quite close) or 'for fun' backyard shooter really need to write a mental term paper each time they draw and shoot an arrow, to get decent results? I'm not sure they do. It's a balance between two worlds: getting as good as you can while having fun, vs. pursuing pinpoint deadly accuracy by treating the task like solving a terra frequency distribution algorithm. Somewhere between the extremes of sloppy shooting and techno-anal extravagance lies a place of common sense for most shooters. Where that is depends on what end of the spectrum you fancy. 'Make up your mind...hunt style or target style', said Hill. To me that's as good a piece of advice on shooting as I've ever heard.
Here are a few video examples of what I mean by the simpler approach to shooting. Notice the 'instinctive' style of sighting and form, unreliant on complicated theory or paint-by-number fussiness. Not quite like Howard Hill form, but perhaps even more to the point about the fact that you don't need to technoshoot to enjoy the sport or be effective. Coolness abounds in the simpler methods and gear, at least for me. Try watching these short vids full-screen, the 'feel' of the unencumbered style and form comes across better. BTW, this footage is clear evidence that one does NOT need to conciously use the arrow as an aiming tool, or hold the bow loosely (for true longbows a firm hand works best).