I’ve met very few quality bows that I didn’t like in some way.
Some of the Browning recurves have indeed shot very well for me. I really like the 62” Browning Explorers from about 1970, for example. Other Brownings have not proved to be my favorites.
But, then again, I could say that exact same thing for EVERY other classic line of bows I’ve ever shot, including the bows of Bear, Wing, Pearson, Hoyt, Howatt, Staghorn and many others. Honestly, I’d say the same thing about today’s bows – Black Widow, Robertson, Shafer Silvertip, Bob Lee, Cascade, Morrison, Pronghorn, Thunderhorn, Habu, Fox, Chastain, Predator, Grreat Plains, Zipper and more. I’ve tried them all. Some of the bows within those lines shot great for me. Others I didn’t care for so much. That seems to be the way it goes.
Actually, there are a bunch of things to consider with any shooter bow. I look at things like how the bow draws at my 29-inch draw length, hand shock and bow jump at the shot, noise at the shot, arrow speed, a forgiving or critical nature and also the historical significance of the bow or line. No bow I’ve ever found is perfect in all of these aspects.
To me, the best of the old Bear hunting recurves score highest when ALL of those aspects are totaled up. I suppose that’s why the old Bear bows have held and even increased (!) their value as collector and shooter bows better than any of the other brands. That doesn't mean the other bows are lesser bows. Some of them do indeed do some things better than the Bear bows. But in total, the old Bear bows are pretty fine bows.