INFO: Trad Archery for Bowhunters



Author Topic: Why not an Alaskan?  (Read 952 times)

Offline Chuck_Delsandro

  • Trad Bowhunter
  • **
  • Posts: 154
Why not an Alaskan?
« on: December 30, 2009, 09:51:00 AM »
I recently bought a "69" Alaskan 45@28 62". It performs very well and will make a great hunting bow. I wonder why they arn't more popular or more valuable??? Opinions please!

Chuck
" It's not the breath you take, it's the moments that take your breath away"

Offline Kevin L.

  • Trad Bowhunter
  • **
  • Posts: 1439
Re: Why not an Alaskan?
« Reply #1 on: December 30, 2009, 10:29:00 AM »
I have a '58 Alaskan dual shelf that shoots great. I know other bows are popular, but the Alaskans and Polars are good shooters, at least what I can gather from mine. Hope to find some other Bears this year, especially a '58 and '59 Kodiak.

Kevin
Appalachian LB 66"57@26
Appalachian LB 68" 60@28
Appalachian Flatbow 64" 56@28
Appalachian Archery RC 58"62@28
Bighorn LB 68" 57@28
HH Wesley LB 66" 53@27
HH Cheetah LB 66" 52@26
Saxon American RC 58" 60@28

Offline blind one

  • Trad Bowhunter
  • **
  • Posts: 595
Re: Why not an Alaskan?
« Reply #2 on: December 30, 2009, 12:04:00 PM »
My sons bow is a 69' Alaskan. Its 62" 25@28. I play with it every now and then. It shoots great. If it was heavier I would use it......Roy
"To die is nothing. One is here, One is no longer here. It is only at the end one must be able to say 'I was a man'"...

Offline PaPaFrank

  • TGMM Member
  • Trad Bowhunter
  • ***
  • Posts: 1561
Re: Why not an Alaskan?
« Reply #3 on: December 30, 2009, 12:31:00 PM »
I loved the '59 Alaskan I owned. It was a great shooter, just a little light, but I hunted with it often... ...
Keep it Simple
TGMM  Family of the Bow
PBS

Offline Kevin L.

  • Trad Bowhunter
  • **
  • Posts: 1439
Re: Why not an Alaskan?
« Reply #4 on: December 30, 2009, 12:41:00 PM »
Beautiful bow Frank. BTW, I'm loving the Polar. You've got me hooked, now I'm checking that auction site every day looking for more.

Take care Bud!

Kevin
Appalachian LB 66"57@26
Appalachian LB 68" 60@28
Appalachian Flatbow 64" 56@28
Appalachian Archery RC 58"62@28
Bighorn LB 68" 57@28
HH Wesley LB 66" 53@27
HH Cheetah LB 66" 52@26
Saxon American RC 58" 60@28

Offline Chuck_Delsandro

  • Trad Bowhunter
  • **
  • Posts: 154
Re: Why not an Alaskan?
« Reply #5 on: December 30, 2009, 01:02:00 PM »
I can see where the white limbs could be an issue to some, but limb covers work nice!

I may have to take mine on hunt before the season is over here in PA.

Frank thanks for the photos. I'll get some of my Alaskan soon!
" It's not the breath you take, it's the moments that take your breath away"

Offline jcar315

  • Trad Bowhunter
  • **
  • Posts: 3843
Re: Why not an Alaskan?
« Reply #6 on: December 30, 2009, 05:47:00 PM »
I have quite a few of the dual shelf Alaskans and I really like them alot. The black and orange glass is very cool looking and they shoot great.

How popular a specific old Bear bow is can change quite a bit from time to time. I picked mine up from TG members and a few off **** too. But only when the price was right!
Proud Dad to two awesome Kids and a very passionate pig hunter.

Right handed but left eye dominant.

Proud to be a Native TEXAN!!!!!

"TGMM  Family of the Bow"

Offline Chuck_Delsandro

  • Trad Bowhunter
  • **
  • Posts: 154
Re: Why not an Alaskan?
« Reply #7 on: December 30, 2009, 07:04:00 PM »
I will also be keeping an eye out for these now. Sorry bout the competetion:)
" It's not the breath you take, it's the moments that take your breath away"

Offline machomanandysavage

  • Trad Bowhunter
  • **
  • Posts: 103
Re: Why not an Alaskan?
« Reply #8 on: December 30, 2009, 11:45:00 PM »
I have 2 dual shelf Alaskans and really like them. I know they made them, but it seems hard to find them in the 55# range.

One thing I noticed is that my green one stacks a lot more at my 30" draw than the black and orange one, which is smooth all the way out.
"Aim small, miss small"

Offline Horney Toad

  • Trad Bowhunter
  • **
  • Posts: 1166
Re: Why not an Alaskan?
« Reply #9 on: December 31, 2009, 12:00:00 PM »
I have seen 1969 Alaskans with zebrawood and they were nice looking bows.

The only problem I have with these bows is they do not have laminated tips. If you have a 1969 Alaskan that you want to use a lot, I'd laminate the tips.

Offline BobT

  • Trad Bowhunter
  • **
  • Posts: 138
Re: Why not an Alaskan?
« Reply #10 on: January 01, 2010, 09:19:00 AM »
I have a '58 Alaskan that I got from Jeremy, it's a great shooter too. It's a little heavy for me at 58# but I can shoot it better than most of the other '58s in my collection. The extra weight helps clean up my sloppy release!
Bob

It's better to shoot for the moon and hit the fence post than to shoot for the fence post and hit the ground!

Offline Kevin L.

  • Trad Bowhunter
  • **
  • Posts: 1439
Re: Why not an Alaskan?
« Reply #11 on: January 01, 2010, 10:54:00 AM »
Bob,
 Let me know if you'd like to swap out that 58#er. Mine's 45# and I have a heck of a time getting a clean release.

Kevin
Appalachian LB 66"57@26
Appalachian LB 68" 60@28
Appalachian Flatbow 64" 56@28
Appalachian Archery RC 58"62@28
Bighorn LB 68" 57@28
HH Wesley LB 66" 53@27
HH Cheetah LB 66" 52@26
Saxon American RC 58" 60@28

Offline Rick P

  • Trad Bowhunter
  • **
  • Posts: 503
Re: Why not an Alaskan?
« Reply #12 on: January 02, 2010, 01:42:00 AM »
I'll definitely be adding a "Alaskan" and a "Polar" to my collection. The 67 "Polar" is a beautiful bow and what Alaskans Bear bow collection would be complete without a "Alaskan"?

Chuck
No reason to complain about white glass when you have snow 6 months a year.
Just this Alaskan's opinion

Offline Chuck_Delsandro

  • Trad Bowhunter
  • **
  • Posts: 154
Re: Why not an Alaskan?
« Reply #13 on: January 02, 2010, 08:03:00 AM »
Good Point Rick!
" It's not the breath you take, it's the moments that take your breath away"

Offline BobT

  • Trad Bowhunter
  • **
  • Posts: 138
Re: Why not an Alaskan?
« Reply #14 on: January 03, 2010, 03:55:00 PM »
Kevin,
I typed 58 too many times I guess, Mine is actually a 56# draw weight. I will let you know if I decide to part with it.

Bob
Bob

It's better to shoot for the moon and hit the fence post than to shoot for the fence post and hit the ground!

Offline Jack Shanks

  • Trad Bowhunter
  • **
  • Posts: 1413
Re: Why not an Alaskan?
« Reply #15 on: January 05, 2010, 07:01:00 PM »
Picked up three old Bears today from a fellow. One is dual shelf Alaskan orange on the belly and black on the back. From reading this post I'm guessing 1959? It's a light weight version at only 26# but a nice looker non the less.
Jack Shanks

Offline Jeremy

  • Trad Bowhunter
  • **
  • Posts: 3242
Re: Why not an Alaskan?
« Reply #16 on: January 06, 2010, 08:16:00 AM »
Quote
Originally posted by BobT:
Mine is actually a 56# draw weight
I'm glad you're still shooting that one!  It's one heck of a nice bow and if it weren't so heavy at my 30" draw it'd still be on my rack  :)
>>>-TGMM Family Of The Bow-->
CT CE/FS Chief Instructor
"Death is not the greatest loss in life.  The greatest loss is what dies inside us while we live." - Norman Cousins

Users currently browsing this topic:

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
 

Contact Us | Trad Gang.com © | User Agreement

Copyright 2003 thru 2024 ~ Trad Gang.com ©