Morning all
I have a LH 1969 Kodiak Hunter which on my scale registers 64# @ 28"
I have also owned a 1954 Kodiak (73#), a 1956 Grizzly(60+#), a 1957 Polar(63#), and a 1957 Kodiak( 60+#) ...(( I listed these because they are all somewhat comparable in poundage))
I also have a Grizzly and a Super Kodiak of comparable year manufacture(but lesser poundage).
My feeling is compared to the other 60+ poundage bows, the Kodiak Hunter seems to be more a "Brutish" shooter( it just seems to have a harder punch. Kind of like a "heavy" thug brawler compared to the finesse and graceful lightness of the others).
Compared to the Grizzly and Super Kodiak of comparable yr, The Kodiak Hunter does not feel as light in my grip or seem as fast as the Grizzly. And it does not even come close to the smoothness and shooting pleasure of the Super Kodiak.
As for shape; the Kodiak Hunter also lacks the smooth trim graceful shape of many of the other Bear bow lines, but to me there is a certain seductiveness to its shape. A feeling of how comfortingly purposeful the KH sits in my hand, as if it belongs there, coiled ready to strike.... never at rest.
All that being said; people who know nothing of bows, when looking at mine, often will point to the Kodiak Hunter and ask "whats that??"...
And my final thoughts; the #1 bow I liked taking to the woods is the Kodiak Hunter, and #2 was the 1957 Kodiak(which is also one of the few bows I regret selling).