Nice bow, but like a lot of "holmegaards" it's pretty flat on the back. My attempts with hickory were the same, from tree of a fairly large diameter, but I recently got a narrow high crowned piece of ironwood that's begging to be a Holmegaard.
The narrow tips are not the only identifying characteristic of a Holmegaard, it is also a small diameter split, unworked crown on the back and a worked flat belly.
This is why it was first mistaken for a "backwards" bow until Fleming Alrune and Erret Callahan showed the way by making their replicas.
A minor detail on the tillering, the handle is thick enough that it won't bend, but the replicas show that a Holmegaard does bend right out of the handle.
If I could figure out how to post a picture on here I would post a photo of my first one in hickory, which was the closest in tiller out of the three to a replica (for a flat backed hickory bow).
Rod.