I am thinking that it took a long time for certain bowyers to make a bow; like Nels; and he was only working for Bear Archery for a short while.
I have one of his bows; with his signature; and Fred Bears signature just before his passing.
Now; should I shoot the bow?
See I don't think so. I think if you have a relic; and shoot it and break it; you have broken a part of history.
If you had a bow that Ishi made; would you shoot it?
If you had a painting like a Monet; would you paint over it to see if the canvas still worked?
If there are ten thousand of a certain kind of bow out there; and you break it; well its not a loss to the history of bows.
But if you went into the Pope and Young museam and started stringing bows; would it be OK ? Would it be OK to take the chance of breaking one by shooting it?
Because I do not see the difference between walking into the P&Y museam; and stringing up one of the bows there and shooting it; and shooting a rare bow out of curiousity that you find in your travels.
If you had the sword that General Lee had; or General Grant; would you get into a playful clanking of the swords with a friend to see what that felt like?
Would you fly the Wright brothers plane if you had the money to buy it?
I don't get the part where shooting a really old bow would tell you what it was like to shoot it when it was new. After 50 or 60 years; the wood - seems like it would shoot differently than when it was made anyway.
I have a bow my father got in the 1930s an Indian Archery bow. It is in the original birch box it came in. I did use it in 1977 on my first real attempt to hunt deer with a bow.
It hardly tossed an arrow. If I had broken it; I would really be mad at myself at this point.
It was 40 years old then at least; and now its over 70 years old. You really think I should shoot it?
I don't understand why so many people would have shot it until it broke. Maybe because then YOUR bow would be worth more?
Please ! think it out!!