The rest of the story as far as I could find out:
The defendant was being charged with helping a friend of his move a poached deer. (He didn't shoot it himself, and was called after the fact to help his buddy get the deer home) He was later tried by a different judge and was (appropriately) found guilty and lost his hunting license for a few years and received a large fine.
She was recusing herself from the case, but she wanted to be sure she had the chance to belittle and berate the defendant - who at this point was still supposed to be "innocent until proven guilty", remember?
Totally inappropriate - but not nearly so inappropriate as forcibly returning his brother to the courtroom and expecting him to stand there and listen to her tirade, because he sighed as he left the courtroom. Then to top it all off, she handcuffs him and put him in a cell because when she asked him a question, his answer wasn't what she wanted to hear.
This is the absolute essence of an activist judge - acting based not on the law, but her own personal biases.
Its sad, discouraging, and thoroughly disgusts me.