"Board bows may be ok for practice but for a really good one you gotta cut a tree or buy a stave."
I'm not sure if this came out wrong or I misinterpreted the post, but this is a pretty strong generalization, especially for all of the guys who now are holding board bows that finally shoot after several failures...only to read that theirs can't truly be "a really good one." Here's some thoughts to ponder...
I've hunted with both board bows and stave bows that I've built. I've killed more with my board bows than my stave bows. However, it does NOT mean that mean board bows are better. I happen to like them more, just as you apparently happen to like stave bows more.
What it does prove is that the bow is only a fraction of the equation. A board stave requires a much careful selection and reading as a tree stave. The last bow I built (see "Paper Backed Longbow") required me to search all 16 racks of lumber at Menards. I went through 178 boards (and I counted) to find one that I felt was satisfactory. The truth be told, I'm much less selective with tree staves.
Then you must possess the skills to tiller the stave or board into a functional bow. Given success thus far, your journey is only beginning. Now you must match the arrow to the bow, shooting style, intended use, etc. I make all of my arrows from scratch and spend far more time working them than I do the bow. Bad arrows from a great bow equal a poor archer, regardless the skill level. Proper arrows from a mediocre bow equate to food on the table or the arrow in the ten ring....or does it?
You would first (or fourthly, as it were) have to consider the large number of variables involved in the actual shooting of the bow: bow-hand grip, release style, body alignment, and so on and so forth. Then, perhaps, you could put meat on the table.
BUT...that's assuming you possess the most important skill of all: the prowess to actually know, understand, study, and bring yourself within hunting range of game. That where the journey ends, and truly begins.
And in regards to the bow shooting fast: a bow can shoot lightning fast, but if you can't hit the mark, you risk missing or severely wounding the prey. You might as well shoot a flabby 110 fps bow with 4" of string follow. However, a mediocre bow that sends its arrow to the mark is far superior in the hand of the one who possess the skills to properly tune his tackle and use it effectively. The bow doesn't know or care about the skill of the archer. It does only what it is commanded to do, and the pair can only be successful within the constraints of the arrow released.
I hope I don't sound angry or crusty, for I'm not. I appreciate the chance to discuss topics like this. I'm not trying, nor will I succeed, in convincing anybody that a particular bow is better than another. Rather, I wanted to point out that ALL of the factors combined create "a really good one."