Well, now that the sinew on the back of the bow dried for a few days, we will sand off the excess glue and sinew on the sides, although it doesn’t look too sloppy. Question: should we leave the sinew wrapped length-wise over the tips or completely remove on the edges so wood is visible along the sides and tips...or is this a preference thing?
After day one of drying, the sinew was a little soft in the thicker areas along the center of the back and at the handle (I purposely added extra sinew at the handle because it was a bit thin)...no reflex in the bow limbs was visible. I put the bow on a form yesterday AM and clamped lightly while it finished drying hoping to get some reflex...I removed the bow from the form a few minutes ago (after ~3 days drying) and there is a little reflex now.
I did a little internet research on using TB verse hide glue and see that there is some debate going both ways. As I sit back and think about it, if the glue gives (i.e. stretches due to latex (?) in the glue) then I can see how the sinew might not work to its maximum efficiency (wondering out loud if “maximum efficiency” can be interpreted (in general) as the amount of reflex a bow gains?) It seems to me that if the sinew is completely hydrated prior to applying, and applying it taunt (i.e. stretched out), it would shrink more, giving the bow a more noticeable reflex. And, it seems logical that if the glue type used dries at the same rate as the sinew (or slower), the maximum benefit of the sinew can be achieved (i.e., if the glue dries faster than the sinew dries, maybe the sinew can be trapped in the glue before it completely shrinks). Also, regarding my babbling above, there are probable many variables that can affect the entire process. I was hoping not to "re-invent the wheel" but I guess it is helpful to learn by your mistakes.