I decided to bring this discussion over from another thread.
Seems as though many bowyers see a piece of wood as, well, just a piece of wood. Never giving any thought to even or uneven limb working properties. Here's a little something I copied from Torges' article "Tillering the Organic Bow".
Torges wrote: As an aside, this might be the place to mention that the reason sister billets were preferred by past masters over full-length staves is that the wood is nearly identical limb to limb. Its working properties therefore are nearly identical. By contrast, if you sift through a stack of full length osage staves you will discover in each one dramatic differences in the growth rings from one nock end to the other. Selfbows of ring porous wood seldom resemble each other not only when made from staves taken from the same tree, but even within themselves, from one end to the other in a full length stave. It may be easier to build a bow from a full length stave rather than having to join sister billets at the handle, but it is simpler not to.
Your thoughts! Art