Author Topic: Missed weight  (Read 915 times)

Offline jsweka

  • TG HALL OF FAME
  • Trad Bowhunter
  • *****
  • Posts: 3571
Re: Missed weight
« Reply #20 on: March 26, 2013, 10:49:00 PM »
That's interesting Jess.  You know, that first bow that I got that stack from was my first experiment using 0.040 glass in a straight limbed bow instead of 0.050 glass.  I made a semi-educated guess on the stack, used 4 actionboo lams and ended up at 54# - only a couple pounds less than what I wanted.  That was the only bow I've ever made with all actionboo lams.  Maybe I just got lucky on that first one.  The current bow only uses 2 actionboo lams.
>>>---->TGMM<----<<<<

Online jess stuart

  • Trad Bowhunter
  • **
  • Posts: 1722
Re: Missed weight
« Reply #21 on: March 26, 2013, 11:04:00 PM »
John, I can't say how much the .050" vs .040" glass would change things.  I am fairly confident .010" of glass would have a greater gain than .010" of corewood but, can't say from experience.  I have very rarely used .050" glass and it was years ago, .040" works well for the weigth and types of bows I build.  
I never noticed a signifant weight change using other types of corewoods, (Red Elm, Walnut, Maple. Black Locust etc.)  only when I use aboo do I have a weight decrease with the same stack.  I don't know for sure what conclusions to draw from that but I do have some.  Interesting to find out someone had a similar experience.

Offline Mike Mecredy

  • Contributing Member
  • Trad Bowhunter
  • ****
  • Posts: 2460
Re: Missed weight
« Reply #22 on: March 27, 2013, 08:13:00 PM »
All bamboo lams in the same stack thickness will be less draw than one with wood in the stack of the same thickness.  Plus I've never noticed walnut lams making a lighter bow, but bamboo, action or natural will.
TGMM Family of the bow
USAF, Retired
A.C.B.C.S.

Offline jsweka

  • TG HALL OF FAME
  • Trad Bowhunter
  • *****
  • Posts: 3571
Re: Missed weight
« Reply #23 on: March 27, 2013, 10:47:00 PM »
Thanks Mike.  You've certainly got more experience at this game than me.  Given what you and Jess have said, I guess maybe that's the basic reason for the difference - all actionboo vs. actionboo & walnut.  Won't make that mistake again.
>>>---->TGMM<----<<<<

Offline MoeM

  • Trad Bowhunter
  • **
  • Posts: 491
Re: Missed weight
« Reply #24 on: March 28, 2013, 02:35:00 AM »
Wasn`t there a testseries by Kenny that showed nearly no difference beetween several corematerials?
(guess a friend told me about once)

Offline jsweka

  • TG HALL OF FAME
  • Trad Bowhunter
  • *****
  • Posts: 3571
Re: Missed weight
« Reply #25 on: March 28, 2013, 04:34:00 AM »
Moe - Yes.  And there wasn't much difference.

  :dunno:    :dunno:
>>>---->TGMM<----<<<<

Offline Mike Mecredy

  • Contributing Member
  • Trad Bowhunter
  • ****
  • Posts: 2460
Re: Missed weight
« Reply #26 on: March 28, 2013, 10:57:00 AM »
If a customer insists on me using bamboo or action bamboo as the laminations I generally add .010 to my total stack thickness to get the wieght I need.  I don't addjust for different types of wood (bamboo isn't wood) or different thickness of fiberglass.
TGMM Family of the bow
USAF, Retired
A.C.B.C.S.

Users currently browsing this topic:

0 Members and 2 Guests are viewing this topic.
 

Contact Us | Trad Gang.com © | User Agreement

Copyright 2003 thru 2024 ~ Trad Gang.com ©