Author Topic: No.2 started out good...But then####  (Read 490 times)

Offline bsv

  • Trad Bowhunter
  • **
  • Posts: 599
No.2 started out good...But then####
« on: January 03, 2015, 05:17:00 PM »
Hi every-one, I've been working on bow #2.I"ve been taking it really slowwww,bent on making target weight this time,maple backed red oak,glued in some reflex.
 
  every thing was going perfect,tillering nicely.target weight of 50#'s.Got her to 54# @ 27 exercising the limbsto 20 pulls and Bang...Well I got that out of the way   :biglaugh:    :biglaugh:
 
  worst part is I dont know why  :confused:But I'm over it and on to #3 It will be maple backed cherry because I have it and don't have to buy anything.I would like 50-55 @ 28 any advice on dims?I like a little longer bow.Any advice would be appreciated.  :bigsmyl:Burt
R/D's soon to come

Offline takefive

  • Trad Bowhunter
  • **
  • Posts: 1098
Re: No.2 started out good...But then####
« Reply #1 on: January 03, 2015, 06:42:00 PM »
Ouch!  I've had a maple backed elm split on the tillering tree at about 24" draw while I was doing the final tillering.  The backer split about 6" from the top limb tip all the way down into the elm handle.  Still don't know why; the grain was very straight.
I've only made one cherry bow.  I backed it with hickory and it fretted in more than one spot on both limbs.  Maybe the hickory backer just over powered it.  Then again, it could have been my tillering.  Either way, I've come to like maple as a belly wood and I stay away from cherry boards.
Hope you have better luck.
It's hard to make a wooden bow which isn't beautiful, even if it's ugly.
-Tim Baker

Offline joe nichols

  • Trad Bowhunter
  • **
  • Posts: 54
Re: No.2 started out good...But then####
« Reply #2 on: January 03, 2015, 08:53:00 PM »
From the picture, I would guess the glue joint gave way then the belly then the back.  Just a hunch.  I've broke a couple and one broke that looked kind of like that, with the belly and back separating.  The back looks like it pulled apart and the belly like it was just pulled too hard.

Offline mwosborn

  • Trad Bowhunter
  • **
  • Posts: 1678
Re: No.2 started out good...But then####
« Reply #3 on: January 03, 2015, 11:33:00 PM »
That's too bad, but it happens and we can learn a lot from the failures.  What were the dimensions of the bow?  Front profile?
Enjoy the hunt!  - Mitch

Offline mikkekeswick

  • Trad Bowhunter
  • **
  • Posts: 988
Re: No.2 started out good...But then####
« Reply #4 on: January 04, 2015, 01:29:00 AM »
Cherry is poor in compression. I would heavily trap the back.

Offline joe nichols

  • Trad Bowhunter
  • **
  • Posts: 54
Re: No.2 started out good...But then####
« Reply #5 on: January 04, 2015, 03:58:00 AM »
From the picture, I would guess the glue joint gave way then the belly then the back.  Just a hunch.  I've broke a couple and one broke that looked kind of like that, with the belly and back separating.  The back looks like it pulled apart and the belly like it was just pulled too hard.

Online Roy from Pa

  • Administrator
  • Trad Bowhunter
  • ****
  • Posts: 20689
Re: No.2 started out good...But then####
« Reply #6 on: January 04, 2015, 08:00:00 AM »
One thing I see is the edges of the limbs are square. That is a starting place for limb failure. Round over all the edges of the limbs, every time you remove wood, make sure the edges are rounded over again. If you had a hinge in that outer 1/3 area of that limb, that could have caused the break also.

Offline bsv

  • Trad Bowhunter
  • **
  • Posts: 599
Re: No.2 started out good...But then####
« Reply #7 on: January 04, 2015, 07:40:00 PM »
Thanks all,I will remember all your coments on my next build.Burt
R/D's soon to come

Users currently browsing this topic:

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
 

Contact Us | Trad Gang.com © | User Agreement

Copyright 2003 thru 2024 ~ Trad Gang.com ©