Originally posted by Jomohr84:
On 3rivers site D97 cost 6 times as much per foot as b55. If it delivered 6x the performance, I would be sold, but imo it doesn't deliver even 2x the performance. Granted it may perform a little better, but just not enough for me to justify the cost difference. Guess I'm one of those extreme cheapskates, lol. I may use a few less strands per string with d97, but that still doesn't nearly offset the cost difference.
6x the performance? Definately not. I don't even know if the performance difference is meaningful to be honest.
What I do know is this .... I have literally never worn out a FF string, and I HAVE worn out b50. The durability is incomparable.
If you're making your own strings, e cost is pretty minimal either way. A 10strand BCY 8125 string which is fine for nearly any mortal draw weight is 75 feet of string or less.
At 8200ft/LB, and $40 for 1/4#, thats 2050 ft for $40, or about 2 cents per foot. So that fancy string only cost $1.50.
So b50 may cost less ... But when I go to mcdonalds I still get cheese on my hamburger even though it costs 12% more because it's still only a buck ....