"tillering a bow by shorting the length of the lower limb"
The beauty of this alternative in a wooden bow, in paricular one where you want to minimize the overal lenght, is you help relieve the strain on the upper thru the geometry, bringing the string angles more into parity by virtue of nock point nearer to dimensional center of the string. In the so called "even" limb design, where the arrow pass is 2" above center on a 4" handle, the upper limb is actually 4" shorter than the lower from the string's perspective AND is required to bend farther.
Notable bowyers have tried to advocate this alternative, and it is well practiced in antiquity, but for some reason there seems to be much resistance to the idea and much confusion circulating about it in more recent times. Evidently folks value the ability to "flip" a selfbow upper for lower limb at some point during it's construction over the theoretical benefit of arrow pass nearer dimensional center.
In a glass bow paradigm there's so much extra work capacity at hand in the material I'm not sure it matters, beyond the obvious need to give the bow enough tiller to be tunable to the intended archer's style.