Matching bows to archers' idioms isn't too difficult. I tiller selfbows, backed bows, glass bows, character bows, bows with one straight limb and one reflexed limb, all of em... all the same way, they're all dynamically balanced, and I expect the first arrow from each of them to shoot wonderfully. Truly dynamically balanced bows are inherently tuned... all you should have to worry about is arrow spine.
Bvas is absolutely correct. His bow/heavy parallel is tipping on the tree. Compare just the 'handle area' of both pics. It's tipping, I promise. Ya gotta be super careful and understanding of this, or your assessments surrounding dynamic balance will be wrong, usually completely converse of the truth, and any following efforts, misdirected.
If a bow on the tree is allowed to tip without resistance, the STRONGER limb(relative to the shooter's holds) will come down farther... and the hook on the string(string hand fulcrum) will generally always follow a plumb line straight down the wall. The key to this method is to adjust relative limb strength so that the bow isn't tipping at full draw.
On the other hand, if a bow on the tree is clamped or otherwise held so that the handle area stays level, the WEAKER limb will come down farther(relatively speaking again), and the string hand fulcrum will drift off of the plumb line, toward the stronger limb. The key with this method is to adjust relative limb strength so the hook follows the plumb line.
So long as this is understood, either method will work to dynamically balance a bow, assuming all else is properly set up... i.e. you are in fact holding and pulling from the proper places... as the archer will.