Here is a pic of it strung up on a bow... In general I just feel it is good too have as many methods possible to evaluate a bow... That way if something is off or you are trying to solve a problem or trying to reach a goal the more tools or methods available to you to help you to see into the bow a little more deeper... I am mainly talking about trying to reach max performance... There are things going on inside a bow that you cannot see... I believe the numbers help you to see...
I use the string tension number just as kind of a barometer... If it is high I expect good performance from the bow... If it is low I expect sub-par performance from a bow... If it is high with sub-par performance it is time to start looking for answers why this is going on and visa-versa when it is low with high performance... If you go looking and find the answer you get more knowledge about the bow, how it works and maybe learn a new trick to tweak performance...
Sure you can trap limbs, add wedges, add some deflex or reflex, change limb angles and core materials... Monkey see monkey do and you might get lucky... But how do you know what is really happening unless you have some concrete numbers to go by... If you just have a bow scale to measure draw weight you are relatively operating blind... Now add a chrongraph and you can see a little better... With each tool you use you see better and better... Tiller sticks to map limbs... Tiller tree with a rope and pulley... A tiller tree that can accurately measure a DFC... String tension scale... When you start seeing the numbers changing for the better you know you are on the right track and getting closer to optimum performance for that bow...
I call it the Alchemy of bow making....
Hope I answered your question and then some...