3Rivers Archery



The Trad Gang Digital Market













Contribute to Trad Gang and Access the Classifieds!

Become a Trad Gang Sponsor!

Traditional Archery for Bowhunters






LEFT HAND BOWS CLASSIFIEDS TRAD GANG CLASSIFIEDS ACCESS RIGHT HAND BOWS CLASSIFIEDS


Author Topic: Skinny strings ?  (Read 6899 times)

Offline valleysniper

  • Trad Bowhunter
  • **
  • Posts: 362
Skinny strings ?
« on: March 01, 2019, 08:27:02 PM »
Who uses them and are they of any real benefit ? I'm looking at getting one for my new Widow. Can I use ff instead of D97 ?

Online The Whittler

  • TG HALL OF FAME
  • Trad Bowhunter
  • *****
  • Posts: 2868
Re: Skinny strings ?
« Reply #1 on: March 01, 2019, 08:47:25 PM »
I can't help with skinny strings but Fast Flight is an older version of low stretch strings. I believe D97 is a newer better material but there are others on here who can help you a lot more the me.

Offline John Krause

  • Trad Bowhunter
  • **
  • Posts: 747
Re: Skinny strings ?
« Reply #2 on: March 01, 2019, 08:48:52 PM »
Did it years ago. Thought it was noisier and not worth it.
When a man shoots with a bow it is own vigor of body that drives the arrow,  his own mind controls the missile's flight......His trained muscles and toughened thews have done the work

Offline valleysniper

  • Trad Bowhunter
  • **
  • Posts: 362
Re: Skinny strings ?
« Reply #3 on: March 01, 2019, 08:52:35 PM »
Ive been out of traditional archery for awhile. Thought ff was the newer of the 2. Been gone longer than I think.....
Lol

Offline Orion

  • TG HALL OF FAME
  • Trad Bowhunter
  • *****
  • Posts: 8261
  • Contributing Member
Re: Skinny strings ?
« Reply #4 on: March 01, 2019, 09:01:33 PM »
Fast flite has sort of become the generic reference to low-stretch strings.  Been around a long time.  D-97 is newer.  That's what I currently use, but have read that some of the newer materials are better yet. 

Yes, for me D-97 is a tad noisier, higher pitched actually, than dacron, but I have no trouble quieting it enough for me with wooly whispers.  Low stretch strings get noticeable performance increases out of most bows and reduce hand shock at the end of the shot.  Unlike dacron, they stay put once shot in, i.e., they don't stretch, at least not as much, with temperature changes, etc.  And, they're more durable than dacron.

Dacron makes a good, quiet string.  I just like D-97 a bit more.

Offline hitman

  • Trad Bowhunter
  • **
  • Posts: 1612
Re: Skinny strings ?
« Reply #5 on: March 01, 2019, 10:07:45 PM »
I use skinny strings and they have been good. No noisier than anything else.
Black Widow PSAX RH 58" 47#@28
Samick Sage 62" 40#@28"
PSA Kingfisher RH 45#@28
Treadway longbow RH 60" 46#at 28"
W.Va. Bowhunters Association life member
Pope and Young associate member
Mississippi Traditional Bowhunters life member

Online Trenton G.

  • Trad Bowhunter
  • **
  • Posts: 1497
Re: Skinny strings ?
« Reply #6 on: March 01, 2019, 10:19:02 PM »
I've only had one bow with a skinny string, but I didn't care for it at all. Even with two massive string silencers it still had a high pitch ring to it whenever I shot it.

Offline Lakerat007

  • Trad Bowhunter
  • **
  • Posts: 126
Re: Skinny strings ?
« Reply #7 on: March 02, 2019, 12:10:12 AM »
I tried a skinny string on a 65# bow and didn't care for it. Cut into my fingers, didn't notice any difference in noise.
The early bird might get the worm, but the second mouse gets the cheese!

Offline Steelhead

  • Trad Bowhunter
  • **
  • Posts: 2546
Re: Skinny strings ?
« Reply #8 on: March 02, 2019, 03:04:25 AM »
I always have swapped out the stock Widow strings in favor of 8 strand SBD Silent but Deadly bowstrings.Its made from D-10 material and the loops on the strings are built up for a cushioning effect.I always have wool puffs on those strings.

In my experience they make for a quieter bow with less vibration and a tad more speed.

I would recommend trying one and seeing for yourself how they compare to the stock string.I think you will feel and hear the difference and find it was money well spent.

Offline Jason W

  • Trad Bowhunter
  • **
  • Posts: 134
Re: Skinny strings ?
« Reply #9 on: March 02, 2019, 06:21:25 AM »
I was never a fan. However, I received a new bow with one on it built by the bowyer. I have to say, I might be a convert...

Offline old_goat2

  • Trad Bowhunter
  • **
  • Posts: 2387
Re: Skinny strings ?
« Reply #10 on: March 02, 2019, 06:26:16 AM »
I've tried them, couldn't really see a difference over a normal sized string. Build my own now and kind of go in between skinny and fat. I think how well it's made and the material it's made from makes a bigger difference than how skinny it is, kind of like people!
David Achatz
CPO USN Ret.
Various bows, but if you see me shooting, it's probably a Toelke in my hand!

Offline LC

  • Trad Bowhunter
  • **
  • Posts: 1302
Re: Skinny strings ?
« Reply #11 on: March 02, 2019, 08:26:29 AM »
I make my own endless loop skinny strings. Have for several years now. In my opinion it has to be built at exactly the right length for each particular bow. Easy for me as I've only used my homemade bows for a long time now.  Once the sweet length is found I find it to be awesome. I do pad the loops and serving area.  I believe the bow shoots quieter and smoother. It is a different sound for sure from B50 though.
« Last Edit: March 02, 2019, 11:08:34 AM by LC »
Most people get rich by making more money than they have needs, me, I just reduced my needs!

Offline Wudstix

  • TG HALL OF FAME
  • Trad Bowhunter
  • *****
  • Posts: 6336
  • Wood arrows & D/R Longbows Rule!!!
Re: Skinny strings ?
« Reply #12 on: March 02, 2019, 09:48:00 AM »
My Big River LB 21st Century version, came with SDS and it shoots noticeably faster than my MOAB, which is fast with a heavy arrow, shooting 185-189 fps with 700 grain arrows.  BR @3# heavier, same length but shoots faster to my eye.  Have not chrono-graphed it yet.  Really have not noticed any increase in noise, but now I'll pay more attention.
 
"If you're not living on the edge, you're taking up too much space!!!" - Me

Psalms 121: 1-3 - King David

60" Big River 67#@28"              
60" MOAB D/R LB 62#@27"
60" Big River D/R LB 65#@27"
62" Kota Badlands LB 72#@28"
62" Howatt TD 62#@28
58” Bear Grizzly 70#@28”
62" Big River D/R LB 60#@30"
66" Moosejaw Razorback LB 60#@28"

"Memento Mori"
PBS - Associate Member
Retired DoD Civ 1985-2019

Online Wheels2

  • Trad Bowhunter
  • **
  • Posts: 1044
Re: Skinny strings ?
« Reply #13 on: March 02, 2019, 09:59:05 AM »
I prefer a thicker loop so it lays fuller in the groove.

D97 and FF+ are interchangeable.  D97 is the only thing I use but FF+ is acceptable to Border Archery.  I use D97 because that is what Steve Baker uses when he builds strings for me.  I recall that he makes the string 12 strands of D97 but pads the loops and lengthens the tags to wrap farther around the big hooks on my Border Covert Hunter.
Super Curves.....
Covert Hunter Hex9h
Morrison Max 6 ILF
Mountain Muffler strings to keep them quiet
Shoot as much weight as you can with accuracy

Offline SteveB

  • SPONSOR
  • Trad Bowhunter
  • *****
  • Posts: 1069
Re: Skinny strings ?
« Reply #14 on: March 02, 2019, 11:18:39 AM »
What is the diameter of a "skinny" string before serving? Don't see how to have a discussion without 1st identifying "skinny". Using strand count doesn't work as available materials can vary 50% and more from one to the next. Break out those micrometers  ;) :)

Online Rob DiStefano

  • Administrator
  • Trad Bowhunter
  • ****
  • Posts: 12248
  • Contributing Member
    • Cavalier Pickups
Re: Skinny strings ?
« Reply #15 on: March 03, 2019, 09:47:24 AM »
low strand count strings were a novelty of sorts for me and i built quite a few, for all the bows i owned and for friend's bows. 

in the long run, i've gone the opposite direction, to higher strand count strings.

while skinny strings can offer a few feet-per-second boost in arrow speed, heavier strings offer the better advantage of Stability and the added "robustness" of more strands in the string.
IAM ~ The only government I trust is my .45-70 ... and my 1911.

Offline Mike Burch

  • Trad Bowhunter
  • **
  • Posts: 661
Re: Skinny strings ?
« Reply #16 on: March 03, 2019, 12:08:51 PM »
low strand count strings were a novelty of sorts for me and i built quite a few, for all the bows i owned and for friend's bows. 

in the long run, i've gone the opposite direction, to higher strand count strings.

while skinny strings can offer a few feet-per-second boost in arrow speed, heavier strings offer the better advantage of Stability and the added "robustness" of more strands in the string.

I tend to agree. I thought it was just me or in my head. I’ve tried several skinny strings and just received a Holm-Made River Runner with a skinny string and it doesn’t “feel” or shoot near as stabile to me as a Kota I have with the thicker string. Don’t like the feel at the shot with the skinny string. Gonna swap it out and see. For whatever reason, and it still maybe in my head, but I rather have a string with more stands than the skinnies. Just seem more stabile and controlling to me.

Online kennym

  • TG HALL OF FAME
  • Trad Bowhunter
  • *****
  • Posts: 17339
Re: Skinny strings ?
« Reply #17 on: March 03, 2019, 12:16:06 PM »
Just out of curiosity, what is string stability?  What does a stable string feel like vs an unstable one?

Serious questions...
Stay sharp, Kenny.

   https://www.kennysarchery.com/

Online Rob DiStefano

  • Administrator
  • Trad Bowhunter
  • ****
  • Posts: 12248
  • Contributing Member
    • Cavalier Pickups
Re: Skinny strings ?
« Reply #18 on: March 03, 2019, 12:34:11 PM »
low strand count strings, regardless of each strand's tensile strength, seem to add more vibration(s) to my longbows, with a shorter "recovery" time after each release.  there is almost always some added string stretch because there are fewer strands.  aesthetically, they have a higher pitched release twang, as well.  they can add perhaps 2 to 5 fps to the arrow speed. 

a higher strand count string has the opposite of all that, for my bows and me.

what makes a string a low strand count?  any bowstring that has the fewest safe number of strands that equate to a tensile strength that is commensurate with the actual holding weight of the bow while at the shooter's draw length.  while i could easily make 4 strand d97/d02 bowstrings, i never went below 6 strands and mostly used 8 strands.  now my strings are 14 strands of the same string fiber.  this is for 45 to 55 pound longbows.  in the way distant past my longbow strings were all flemish, but i quickly changed over to endless.

all of this is infused with a fair amount of subjectivity.  there is no right or wrong, only what works best for each of us.
IAM ~ The only government I trust is my .45-70 ... and my 1911.

Offline Mike Burch

  • Trad Bowhunter
  • **
  • Posts: 661
Re: Skinny strings ?
« Reply #19 on: March 03, 2019, 12:36:10 PM »
Kennym,

Hard for me to put in words, but it’s a feel thing for me. I’ll try and describe my thinking. I tend to like a softer shot at release, and the skinnies I’ve tried seem to have a quicker faster/response, which for me and personal preference, doesn’t feel controlling, where a thicker string for me has a softer take off at release. I’m not sure if that makes sense and stability may not be the right word.

I think I probably should say I just prefer a little thicker string for myself. Lol.

Mike

Users currently browsing this topic:

0 Members and 2 Guests are viewing this topic.
 

Contact Us | Trad Gang.com © | User Agreement

Copyright 2003 thru 2024 ~ Trad Gang.com ©