if I want string follow I'd rather put it there intentionally.
Intentional means to deflex the limb on the form rather than have the bow take set after being drawn? The object being to create a lower string tension at brace possibly?
My suggestion about proper limb taper was to prevent set/damage being taken at the fades. Isn't set at the fades what causes excessive handshock?
Yes, that's how "string follow" is induced when it's intentional. Many ASL stle bows that are layed up flat take on the string follow with use just as a self bow does.
I don't think hand shock is related to set at the fades. One of my bows is built with an arc of reflex in the outer 24 inches of the limbs. It was originally destined to be a wide pyramid bow with. O02 total taper. 68" NtN. There was a huge bit of squiggle in the form and it ended up being 1 1/8" at the fades.
. It took some set at the fades but it doesn't have hand shock. It's actually a pretty good bow. It was meant to be 55# but ended up at 43#. DFC is a plumb straight line, whereas a string follow bow tends to have a bit of perch belly in the DFC.
I think hand shock is from an incorrect grip (chockin the chicken) and/or poor tillering.