"With all due respect that everyone is entitled to their opinions, including this "expert", this kind of categorization is unnecessary, inaccurate and somewhat demeaning. Who is he or I or anyone else to judge who an individual is by how he/she chooses to exercise their love of this sport? If today I shoot a 3-d range does that make me a bowman, and tomorrow when I shoot paper targets am I an archer? But then only if properly attired, right? Rubbish. Ever since reading "The Witchery of Archery" by Maurice Thompson I've considered myself an Archer (who really prefers to stumpshoot wearing some kind of clothes I'm not allowed to M-F).
Dave "
Good Post Dave. Is it just me or is there an ever increasing need by some to draw lines between this, that and the other thing?
Can't be healthy...
Lenny