Came across this on Fred Anderson’s builds.
Cool. Are these FG or wood bows being discussed?
I watched a few old videos and read some material about how Howard Hill was playing with a type of Perry reflex design. In these experiments they were reflexing the wood lams and gluing them up first. Then they would flatten them back out straight when the put the glass on the bow pre stressing the wood.
This is what I mentioned above for reducing the strain on the core and minimizing set.
I can see how this would add both tension and relieve compression doing this..... But if you put the reflex in the lams and glass putting them in the form in a reflex shape.... and straighten the limb out when you are stringing it, it produces more tension at brace. The induced strain is applied as you string the bow in the form of "Pre load" at brace.
This is not prestressing the components as such, but it does generate a lot more string tension at brace, as you say. I can believe what you say about your reflexed HH design, I think high string tension at brace is a good thing for stopping the limbs fast and it really pumps up the F/D curve and energy storage.
But..... The Howard Hill fan club turned up their noses to my design because of the shape of it unstrung.... Go figure.
People are fickle; they often choose tradition over performance. This applies to everyone on this forum, as well. Anyone interested in truly maximum bow performance shoots a compound. It is the modern solution to the question of how to best launch an arrow. And yet every last one of us doesn't choose a compound because we like traditional bows for other reasons.
Mark