Author Topic: Prestress and Performance...  (Read 2806 times)

Online Kirkll

  • SPONSOR
  • Trad Bowhunter
  • *****
  • Posts: 2416
Re: Prestress and Performance...
« Reply #20 on: April 28, 2022, 12:00:06 PM »
The pre stress in a bow limb using fiberglass or even wood is already being done by shaping the reflex in the form.

You don't get much in the way of induced strain in a FG bow because the lams are too thin and flexible. In an all wood bow you can generate enough strain to be significant if it is done right. This is what Perry reflex does.


Mark

I watched a few old videos and read some material about how Howard Hill was playing with a type of Perry reflex design. In these experiments they were reflexing the wood lams and gluing them up first. Then they would flatten them back out straight when the put the glass on the bow pre stressing the wood. 

I can see how this would add both tension and relieve compression doing this..... But if you put the reflex in the lams and glass putting them in the form in a reflex shape.... and straighten the limb out when you are stringing it, it produces more tension at brace. The induced strain is applied as you string the bow in the form of "Pre load" at brace.

Look at that Boot Hill Express shape on the Big Foot weekend thread.  I have built absolut replicas of Howard Hill long bows you could not tell the difference between them after they were strung. But there is a HUGE difference in performance.... not a little bit.... a LOT of difference with no hand shock either.

But..... The Howard Hill fan club turned up their noses to my design because of the shape of it unstrung.... Go figure. :dunno: :dunno:

Kirk
Big Foot Bows
Traditional Archery
[email protected]
http://bigfootbows.com/b/bows/

Online mmattockx

  • Trad Bowhunter
  • **
  • Posts: 667
Re: Prestress and Performance...
« Reply #21 on: April 28, 2022, 12:03:37 PM »
Came across this on Fred Anderson’s builds.

Cool. Are these FG or wood bows being discussed?


I watched a few old videos and read some material about how Howard Hill was playing with a type of Perry reflex design. In these experiments they were reflexing the wood lams and gluing them up first. Then they would flatten them back out straight when the put the glass on the bow pre stressing the wood.

This is what I mentioned above for reducing the strain on the core and minimizing set.
 

I can see how this would add both tension and relieve compression doing this..... But if you put the reflex in the lams and glass putting them in the form in a reflex shape.... and straighten the limb out when you are stringing it, it produces more tension at brace. The induced strain is applied as you string the bow in the form of "Pre load" at brace.

This is not prestressing the components as such, but it does generate a lot more string tension at brace, as you say. I can believe what you say about your reflexed HH design, I think high string tension at brace is a good thing for stopping the limbs fast and it really pumps up the F/D curve and energy storage.


But..... The Howard Hill fan club turned up their noses to my design because of the shape of it unstrung.... Go figure. :dunno: :dunno:

People are fickle; they often choose tradition over performance. This applies to everyone on this forum, as well. Anyone interested in truly maximum bow performance shoots a compound. It is the modern solution to the question of how to best launch an arrow. And yet every last one of us doesn't choose a compound because we like traditional bows for other reasons.


Mark
« Last Edit: April 28, 2022, 12:13:25 PM by mmattockx »

Online garyschuler

Re: Prestress and Performance...
« Reply #22 on: April 28, 2022, 12:57:50 PM »
Mark. Eloquently stated for everyone. Some birds are multi color and others are black, green, but they all fly.!! Well said my friend. There is no right or wrong, only your own decisions.
Gary Schuler

Online Kirkll

  • SPONSOR
  • Trad Bowhunter
  • *****
  • Posts: 2416
Re: Prestress and Performance...
« Reply #23 on: April 28, 2022, 01:17:35 PM »
Quote
People are fickle; they often choose tradition over performance. This applies to everyone on this forum, as well. Anyone interested in truly maximum bow performance shoots a compound. It is the modern solution to the question of how to best launch an arrow. And yet every last one of us doesn't choose a compound because we like traditional bows for other reasons.

I can wrap my head around tradition, and respect the different opinions on that subject. But i disagree about traditional archers not being concerned with arrow trajectory, and kinetic energy. Higher performance traditional bows used for hunting provide a flatter trajectory, they hit harder, and are very quiet. 

Good example would be the phone call i recieved this morning.  This guy wants to lower his draw weight to something more comfortable, but still shoot his 512 grain arrows at a high 170's low 180's. and keep his trajectory the same as he was getting with a heavier bow.....  This can be accomplished with a higher performance bow.

I get these kind of customers all the time wanting lower draw weight with good power....There are a lot of them too.

Kirk
Big Foot Bows
Traditional Archery
[email protected]
http://bigfootbows.com/b/bows/

Online mmattockx

  • Trad Bowhunter
  • **
  • Posts: 667
Re: Prestress and Performance...
« Reply #24 on: April 28, 2022, 01:32:27 PM »
I can wrap my head around tradition, and respect the different opinions on that subject. But i disagree about traditional archers not being concerned with arrow trajectory, and kinetic energy.

I didn't say we aren't concerned with the performance of our bows, we do care. But that's not the absolute maximum performance possible with modern technology and design. We think a bow that shoots in the 180fps range is good, compounds shoot in the 300+fps range. With skill and good equipment compounds are good for hunting well past 60yds. How far can you reliably take game with a trad bow?


Mark

Online Kirkll

  • SPONSOR
  • Trad Bowhunter
  • *****
  • Posts: 2416
Re: Prestress and Performance...
« Reply #25 on: April 28, 2022, 01:51:08 PM »
No argument there at all brother... I was one of them for a lot of years and took elk with a compound bow at 80-90 yards a few times 300 fps 444 grain arrows..... But..... It's more like rifle hunting when you start shooting long distance, with the disadvantage of that 1.5 second flying time reaching the animal...  It wasn't archery hunting any more to me.

I'm late to the game as a traditional archer. But Once i got the traditional bug and shortened up my game to close encounters, it was a lot more fun. But i can kill an elk at 40 yards with a good flat shooting 55# bow with 544 grain arrows, and blow right through them.   Kirk
Big Foot Bows
Traditional Archery
[email protected]
http://bigfootbows.com/b/bows/

Online mmattockx

  • Trad Bowhunter
  • **
  • Posts: 667
Re: Prestress and Performance...
« Reply #26 on: April 28, 2022, 02:50:46 PM »
But..... It's more like rifle hunting when you start shooting long distance

I agree with that. I've shot a buddy's compound a couple times and it feels way more like shooting a firearm than a bow. It's interesting for a few minutes then it gets boring once I start drilling arrows on top of one another shot after shot. It just feels like there is no character there at all.


Mark

Online Mad Max

  • TG HALL OF FAME
  • Trad Bowhunter
  • *****
  • Posts: 6565
Re: Prestress and Performance...
« Reply #27 on: April 29, 2022, 12:31:57 PM »
You have to tension the core and glue the back glass on at the same time, then you have to glue the belly on it in the form
Glass bow

Having a great time at the classic
I would rather fail at something above my means, than to succeed at something  beneath my means  
}}}}===============>>

Users currently browsing this topic:

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
 

Contact Us | Trad Gang.com © | User Agreement

Copyright 2003 thru 2024 ~ Trad Gang.com ©