First of all, I have never played with the Turkish design at all, or tested them either. So I can not even speculate on the performance with any degree of accuracy. But …. I believe there may be a difference between the “Forward” limb travel of a static tip recurve, and the Turkish design, where the limb tips are traveling a different direction and hinge at the fades, or what they call the knee portion of the bow.
When a static tip recurve is drawn, the actual length of the bow from tip to tip can increase slightly as the tips stand straight up, and this shortens the forward limb travel a lot. How much is determined on the location of the working portion of the limb, and the preload tension on the string at brace height. Your mileage will vary a lot depending on your limb shape, taper rates, and actual preload.
With a Turkish design the actual length of the bow at full draw vs brace ht is a lot different. The limbs are moving more up and down than they are moving forward.
Not being an engineer, or having any testing experience with this design, I couldn’t tell you if this makes a difference mathematically or otherwise in terms of preload tension at brace , and stoping the limbs movement clean.
On a D shaped long bow, with low preload string tension at brace that bends the full length of the bow to the grip, you have a lot more forward limb travel. This often results in hand shock in the bow, and a loss of performance with lighter arrow shafts.
The same D shape bow built with more reflex to the limbs with a longer riser, longer fades and the limbs bending more at the tips with higher preload tension at brace will have less limb travel and stop the limb tips cleaner. The results is less hand shock, and higher performance using lighter weight shafts. Especially using a FF string.
But……. Here’s the rub…… A D shape long bow that bends the full length can shoot heavier shafts with a much higher percentages of energy transfer than using lighter arrows due to the momentum build up during the power stroke. This can even be accomplished using a Dacron string vs a fast flight….. the heavier the shaft the higher the percentage of energy transfer is.
Maybe the same theory applies to the Turkish bows? I have no idea. Does The momentum of the limbs and the mass weight of the limbs actually help the performance? And how does the arrow weight effect the performance of this design? I would think Heavier arrows would yield a higher percentage of energy transfer with a longer draw length.
I’ll be curious to hear what you Turkish bow builders have to say regarding this.
It would be interesting to know the difference in string tension level at brace between a 50# static tip recurve and the Turkish design of the same weight.
Kirk